From user-return-19469-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Thu Jan 12 16:50:32 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E38AB4D6 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18044 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 16:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 17997 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 16:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 17989 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2012 16:50:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:50:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:50:23 +0000 Received: by vbbey12 with SMTP id ey12so609592vbb.11 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:50:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.33.114 with SMTP id q18mr2089695vdi.75.1326387002530; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:50:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.167.202 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:49:41 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.4.109.196] In-Reply-To: References: From: Mark Hahn Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:49:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: couch attachments versus amazon S3 To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3079bdf01ed9f504b6578ad2 --20cf3079bdf01ed9f504b6578ad2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hmmm. I wonder where I got that idea. Maybe it is the max size of a doc. Thanx. On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Robert Newson wrote: > That's not a limit for couchdb attachments to my knowledge (that would > be 'the size of your disk'). > > B. > > On 12 January 2012 16:38, Mark Hahn wrote: > >> "too large for couch attachments": how so? > > > > Greater than 2 GB. > --20cf3079bdf01ed9f504b6578ad2--