couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Kocoloski <kocol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Delete replication history
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:58:17 GMT
On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:41 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:23 AM, Paul Hirst wrote:
>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Robert Newson [mailto:rnewson@apache.org]
>>>> Sent: 24 December 2011 12:46
>>>> To: user@couchdb.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Delete replication history
>>>> 
>>>> I believe Jim is referring to the replication checkpoint document
>>>> (which does indeed include 'historical' information). Jim is also
>>>> correct in that the presence of this document will prevent a full
>>>> re-replication when the target's validate_doc_update function is
>>>> altered.
>>>> 
>>>> Jim, the replication checkpoint document is named in the way:
>>>> /dbname/_local/<hash>. You should be able to see this document being
>>>> written to in the logs and the <hash> portion is also the value you
>>>> get back when POST'ing to _replicate (and the one shown in
>>>> _active_tasks). Delete the document in the usual fashion and
>>>> replication will do over from the start.
>>> 
>>> I've only ever been able to find the hash value in the log. If it's in _active_tasks
where is it?
>>> 
>>> My replication entries in _active_tasks look like
>>> 
>>> ba3959: http://myserver.example:5984/mydb/ -> mydb
>>> 
>>> And I don't believe ba3959 is long enough. Isn't the hash an MD5 of the replication
information?
>>> 
>>> If there was a way to get it out of _active_tasks it would be extremely convenient.
>>> 
>>> Sophos Limited, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, United
Kingdom.
>>> Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 991 2418 08.
>> 
>> 
>> Currently _active_tasks only reports the first six characters of the hash.  I'm not
opposed to having it report the full hash, especially now that the _active_tasks output is
semi-structured.
> 
> The branch for the next major release, 1.2.x, already reports the full
> id (unlike all current releases which only report the first 6
> characters in _active_tasks).

Ah, thanks for the correction Filipe!
Mime
View raw message