Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 158DA98A2 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 22:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27476 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2011 22:23:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 27447 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2011 22:23:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 27439 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2011 22:23:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:23:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of email.workbench@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.180] (HELO mail-qy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.216.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:23:06 +0000 Received: by qcse1 with SMTP id e1so3628817qcs.11 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:22:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=ROK5URySxXNrsEU49QNu2IUqNTuJWqsNz2+zroOvVTo=; b=RBsJD5k9Abhel+ChRaNJJgnRwmPGDzAOBNykdnf1b2X+ysR4a92nkyL2t3RQXVA8aI W7RfOrk/RAgu71ayXNxhZ+28YlinIhV9i2M9nSIJAbaXU2pe8DPxdKDX1ajSLt6PvgB9 /2IwgKAdRlDbqhij+uch4Q9m6D9VuSw2Za4Dw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.220.164 with SMTP id px4mr12423870igc.8.1323210165835; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:22:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: email.workbench@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.33.68 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:22:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:22:45 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OuFuL8W2GuuXH1XEzPCTBrCxh_c Message-ID: Subject: Can-Do CouchDB but only if they knew abou it From: Zdravko Gligic To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi folks, I have been keeping an eye on the GAE group, where topics like this make me naturally think of CouchDB. http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/6f94c6d80ef0fc51 The whole thread is worth taking a look at, especially this ... Jeff Schnitzer On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM says ...."This brings up an interesting question. Without a full-database MVCC system, how do you backup the whole database? Especially with multigroup transactions, there's no way to guarantee an isolated snapshot. Depending on how your application works, getting a consistent backup might be impossible. Jeff". I see people going through pain like that and I keep on asking my self why nobody within CouchDB community is making noises to make everyone aware that a solid alternative exists for so many of these types of pain? Regards, teslan