couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Koji Kawamura <ijokaruma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Futon Test Suites Failed: CouchDB 1.1.0 FF5.0
Date Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:49:02 GMT
Hi

Thank you all for helping me.

I've tried to create a new FireFox profile as well as re-install it,
but the "Exception raised: {}" error still occurs...
Since it passed once, I decided to move forward, I want to develop an
application.
Although, I'll let everyone know when I find the cause of this problem.

Plus, I've joined the dev@ mailing list :)

Thanks,
Koji

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Koji,
>
> the test suite can be somewhat brittle (there's a thread on dev@ that discusses this)
and we are in the process of moving as much as possible out of the browser that avoids this
situation. In fact, the upcoming 1.2.x and master (neé trunk) branches already have a simplified
"verify installation" option that isn't prone to as many issues.
>
> You can try to run individual tests a few times until they pass at least once. It might
be that some specific test (attachments comes to mind) doesn't work in every browser.
>
> If you or anyone wants to help out with this, please join the dev@ mailing list and join
the thread there :)
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 23:25 , Koji Kawamura wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been trying to pass all tests but I still get failed.
>>
>> I installed CouchDB 1.1.0 from tarball following to this installation guide.
>> "Building CouchDB from source (with EPEL packages)"
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Installing_on_RHEL5
>>
>> I'm using CentOS 5.7 as a VM hosted on Windows 7.
>>
>> When I run the test suites from FireFox 5.0,
>> I got these failures:
>>
>>
>> attachment_paths      error   4700ms
>>    Exception raised: {}
>>
>> form_submit   error   415ms
>>    Exception raised: {}
>>
>> invalid_docids        error   836ms
>>    Exception raised: {}
>>
>> oauth error   10849ms
>>    Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
>> http://couchdb:5984/test_suite_db_a/"}
>>
>> replication   error   17703ms
>>    Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
>> http://couchdb:5984/test_suite_db_b/"}
>>
>> replicator_db error   10891ms
>>    Assertion failed: copy !== null
>>    Exception raised: {"message":"copy is
>> null","fileName":"http://couchdb:5984/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0","lineNumber":143,"stack":"filtered_replication()@http://couchdb:5984/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0:143\u000arun_on_modified_server([object
>> Array],filtered_replication)@http://couchdb:5984/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0:375\u000a(false)@http://couchdb:5984/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0:737\u000arun(-2)@http://couchdb:5984/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0:91\u000a"}
>>
>> security_validation   error   17461ms
>>    Exception raised: {"error":"db_not_found","reason":"could not open
>> http://couchdb:5984/test_suite_db_b/"}
>>
>> stats failure 40474ms
>>    Assertion 'triggered, "We managed to force a all_dbs_active
>> error."' failed: We managed to force a all_dbs_active error.
>>
>> view_compaction       failure 3616ms
>>    Assertion failed: resp.view_index.disk_size < disk_size_before_compact
>>
>> view_errors   error   1890ms
>>    Exception raised: {}
>>
>> 69 of 69 test(s) run, 10 failures (634302 ms)
>>
>> Does anyone have the same experience and know a workaround for this?
>> Any information is appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Koji
>
>

Mime
View raw message