couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Max Ogden <>
Subject Re: Guys with deep knowledge about CouchDB Replication, I'd need your help :)
Date Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:18:58 GMT
beginnings of an html5 couch:

it would be great to get @mikeal and @tilgovi to chime in on this
thread as they were writing the replicator for that

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Michael Aufreiter <> wrote:
> I'm currently working on a complete data-persistence solution for offline apps, involving
CouchDB and Data.js. I already introduced Data.js here at this mailing list the other day,
but here's a link again:
> I've setup a cleanroom example (tasks) that I want to test the new sync-functionality
> (don't miss the sync button in the upper right corner)
> It's currently just one way. It just writes changes to the server but does not pull in
node-updates. Now this should change.
> The algorithm for a bi-directional sync I have in mind looks like so:
> 1. Pull: For all nodes I have in my local graph, check if there are updates (other users
might have updated them), and if yes, pull them in
>  If conflicts occur the client/user decides how to resolve it (choose a revision or
merge it)
> 2. Push: Write all local dirty nodes to the server
> If that succeeded, the sync is complete. Usually if there's not much time between the
pull and the push it's unlikely to run into conflicts when doing the push.
> However I'm asking myself how CouchDB replication is implemented -- maybe I can re-use
some of the concepts.
> In order to perform the Pull, I thought about sending a list of ID's+revisions to the
server. The server (resp. Couch) should then check if there are updates for any of them. If
yes, those nodes should be fetched and delivered to the client. Given that number of ID/revision
pairs, what would be the best way to check for updates? Or do you have any other ideas on
how to do the pull?
> An implication of this scenario is that application developers should do their best to
keep the local graph rather small (the bigger it gets the more overhead you have when doing
the push, also more memory is used). However this should suit a lot of scenarios (like in
my case making possible offline editing of documents)
> Would be great if some of you could help me out a bit here. I think such a framework
(Data.js+Couch) would be a great benefit for application developers who wan't to build offline
apps. What do you think?
> Thanks!
> -- Michael

View raw message