Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7E2D4D37 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99791 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 11:22:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 99751 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 11:22:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 99743 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 11:22:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:22:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sean.copenhaver@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:21:59 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so348033vws.11 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 04:21:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ouX+G0ucNOnxJDwOWlaNdz7TT2aCFkpiD2I9KTqP2po=; b=Evpl4nt2sP+uYWaTL+s/LDaPasoY7BAapxSl9pVqQE9xUNsp90PLFrhj4TyriMhVv9 4l2q+w6t3SVJCm5QtrW/NdXEpkZL3UnwT1waJa/MhdczlE5ke0Oa0qedEzU/DAPMglJt ugOnDKgzE+jcy/SRuosmd5ub8DbjApeuZyCWU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XvWDtGG5NZskwGwaVu/1QFKVpjkl4tuf2Ex/Hteoil4RyGy4z/Nw1g8RcWsn27q2fw EkIo6aHvQ6QCHf0/Fymh5iVgyZUeuLqTG0g0MpicIkQtG1e7AWe/B0cY19rzSvq/osSA Z7XOuQ2KH7pNdrP46U7uQGC21+QaaphaY/uR0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.98.97 with SMTP id eh1mr1272289vdb.7.1307532098483; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 04:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.185.167 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:21:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DEF4456.5060107@gmail.com> References: <4DDDFD4E.9060701@gmail.com> <4DDF164A.7030009@gmail.com> <4DDF6BEE.8070907@gmail.com> <4DE4F6F4.9000406@couchone.com> <4DECC426.9070201@gmail.com> <4DEDC36C.5090207@gmail.com> <4DEEFF3E.1070807@gmail.com> <4DEF4456.5060107@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:21:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Complex queries & results From: Sean Copenhaver To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d046c4335ed04a5318a10 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307d046c4335ed04a5318a10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Torstein, great to here that the reduce is working for you. For stale=3Dupdate_after/ok, does that mean the next query could block unti= l the view updated? Even if the it was also a stale=3Dupdate_after/ok query? On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Torstein Krause Johansen < torsteinkrausework@gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/06/11 13:56, Marcello Nuccio wrote: > >> I have not tested it, but CouchDB 1.1 does have some improvements: >> >> >> http://docs.couchbase.org/couchdb-release-1.1/index.html#couchdb-release= -1.1-etag >> >> http://docs.couchbase.org/couchdb-release-1.1/index.html#coudhdb-release= -1.1-updateafter >> > > Thanks for the hints, stale=3Dupdate_after seems to be reason enough for > upgrading to 1.1 :-) > > Cheers, > > -Torstein > --=20 =93The limits of language are the limits of one's world. =93 -Ludwig von Wittgenstein --20cf307d046c4335ed04a5318a10--