Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikSDdoLWqBuKgsX4DOg=2EteHMefA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTim_HtW4jwDE0t4i6hYr5EPbzC3X+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTik56z0cV1SJN2wdXg3Wqe=1xNbc-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikXgU=mhGkr_312-17RkdkGtNbL9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikSDdoLWqBuKgsX4DOg=2EteHMefA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:22:59 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTim1hg-+CPWwYw2oCqk9Dd8vmTuJPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CouchDB vs RavenDB (Specific features)
From: Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I don't think we should encourage the use of temporary views. I'm one
of the folks that wants to remove that feature once we develop a
suitable replacement (an in-browser 'view preview' simulator, for
example).

On 30 June 2011 09:21, Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 04:56, Sean Copenhaver
> <sean.copenhaver@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> *Auto Indexing
>> I'm guessing you are talking about if you can issue CouchDB a
>> dynamic/temporary view and if CouchDB will build and store the index. I
>> don't believe it does and when you issue the temporary view I believe
>> CouchDB basically does all the work and then throws it away. Those are
>> really meant for development/testing purposes.
>
> I believe the work is not thrown away until a view cleanup is
> requested. Identical temporary views should be fast and creating a
> permanent view with identical source should not require a full
> rebuild.
>
> -Randall
>