Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 164CD6B92 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56051 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 09:02:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 55915 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2011 09:02:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 55907 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2011 09:02:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:02:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of torsteinkrausework@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.52] (HELO mail-pw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.160.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:02:39 +0000 Received: by pwi4 with SMTP id 4so836692pwi.11 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 02:02:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fYWZJSo7gBivJjy5MY+Z9iUBEy+KsItpaDEHw2166ls=; b=lfMOfBVSIrx/yatyPAVtST0XdBQlKdw0iIIuESZgWFFj7FaXQbNjefARe2gIuMNN5a KGfAtLQZ4BLduBjL45nl4go/S++nCTsFugMiws9yAy+E3qjIHW4XXULxHKAK7USnVa8S ex1ootepyoK4gqEtPfkXl/JNkyCC2tprPHuMQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fc7TW3rzeINkS0kEjtmjUoTtXwPJyaEezDNZA4l3P6AlGauMzbFh5F5v2+IdOXWRdt VsRoPK0ZmuCjY4kSeOIbW2jX41ZmO/HxEcH1loj8LL9Nali97r20lJnBQq7zOuGbwp29 eWeORPlAu+NaHfLbYmG68iayt03oKg4F/UJS0= Received: by 10.142.166.20 with SMTP id o20mr73583wfe.121.1307610138099; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 02:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (114-40-21-231.dynamic.hinet.net [114.40.21.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l10sm1514040wfk.21.2011.06.09.02.02.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 02:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DF08C15.7060206@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:02:13 +0800 From: Torstein Krause Johansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110510 Icedove/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Complex queries & results References: <4DDDFD4E.9060701@gmail.com> <4DDF164A.7030009@gmail.com> <4DDF6BEE.8070907@gmail.com> <4DE4F6F4.9000406@couchone.com> <4DECC426.9070201@gmail.com> <4DEDC36C.5090207@gmail.com> <4DEEFF3E.1070807@gmail.com> <4DEF4456.5060107@gmail.com> <4DF07CAD.8000502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Heya, On 09/06/11 16:07, Marcello Nuccio wrote: > 2011/6/9 Torstein Krause Johansen: >> >> On 08/06/11 19:21, Sean Copenhaver wrote: >>> For stale=update_after/ok, does that mean the next query could block until >>> the view updated? Even if the it was also a stale=update_after/ok query? >> >> I've tested this with two eternal wget loops, one running with stale=ok and >> one the default non stale data setting. > > I think a more interesting test is with two loops, one running with > stale=ok and one running with stale=update_after. Could be, but I'm still on 0.11.0-2.3 :-) > I expect stale=update_after to behave the same as stale=ok but also > trigger view index update. > Is this true? Don't know, but that's what I'd expect too. Cheers, -Torstein