couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl>
Subject Re: Has Erlang's promise of parallelism been realised in CouchDB?
Date Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:10:49 GMT
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:38, Robert Dionne
<dionne@dionne-associates.com> wrote:
>  I think one thing that really impacts performance with the view indexer is the storing
of the reductions
> in the internal nodes of the btree.

What do you mean by internal, here? Do you mean that they shouldn't be
stored at all, or that they should be stored separately somehow?

(Alternatively: this sounds interesting, please explain what you mean.)

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Mime
View raw message