Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29067410D for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11462 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:32:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 11428 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2011 22:32:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 11419 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2011 22:32:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:32:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.180] (HELO mail-wy0-f180.google.com) (74.125.82.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:32:44 +0000 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so6605847wyj.11 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:32:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.205.12 with SMTP id fo12mr2726741wbb.70.1306189942578; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:32:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.154.148 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 15:32:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [156.33.195.149] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:32:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question on Load Balanced Configuration From: Matthew Woodward To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174a07c8895fcd04a3f90b1f --0015174a07c8895fcd04a3f90b1f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > If you can think of any more details that are relevant, please post them. > Probably the most relevant detail is that we threw two more servers behind the load balancer and I didn't know they were active. :-) So that explains the behavior. Sorry I didn't follow up to my original note. Appreciate the reply! -- Matthew Woodward matt@mattwoodward.com http://blog.mattwoodward.com identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --0015174a07c8895fcd04a3f90b1f--