Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jeroentjevandijk@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.52 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=jBO5lrwjamskcJPbhZd+AvhZrDwnekfmbeDKGU7+jBUIMYnXap9TUKWzjef39x03kx
         4T+ZQX55zZK9ws3R3lAb43zezGHCfoClbZlk62aHHlar21hqpRz9olnTQrUMUO3mHlpb
         u3j/n1HnvXwMRznzRKxZJjEFBc/zPGAAsUQFc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=NVP4N+-nUgWU6Y26Gz5xg-zZj8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4DB06591.4060600@gmail.com>
	<BANLkTimUy_-vgQb-oFUG7Oaihdt9p2RoDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<DD2C68F4-6416-4D4A-94B7-300BB8E0ED2C@me.com>
	<BANLkTintYLCyNcW8hKVXZJOxkg8GjdVDAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinOAEp_eGzpOEpdnstOH+DM_QKiwg@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinTWVnqAok4hASei4oBQbOWS9WF1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinYAq8xQQCHW_TX+Vvf-nS-t-QO6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=NVP4N+-nUgWU6Y26Gz5xg-zZj8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:50:47 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTine5BoVoZs7N5yjN5GoY8P_-3WWQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Help needed: is couchDB a good fit for my app?
From: Jeroen van Dijk <jeroentjevandijk@gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520e99715b4dc04a1d373e3

--bcaec520e99715b4dc04a1d373e3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
>

I believe Jeoren was confused because I mixed up some definitions, and did
> not call filtered replication by its name, but called it a view.
>

I was just wondering what the reasoning was for the extra layer, but Nebu's
reply made that perfectly clear. I assumed it was possible to enforce the
filter somehow. I also thought I had seen some authorization examples, but
that must have been a mistake. Good to know these constraints.

Jeroen

--bcaec520e99715b4dc04a1d373e3--