Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47531 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2011 14:31:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2011 14:31:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 65751 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 14:30:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 65726 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2011 14:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 65718 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2011 14:30:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:30:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jjlucsy@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.180] (HELO mail-pv0-f180.google.com) (74.125.83.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:30:51 +0000 Received: by pvg2 with SMTP id 2so965257pvg.11 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:30:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3FRMv+m76X3rBGkzOXvnfyTdrOppkjqs2PUJNy5uU0I=; b=XFfhYyafW7TA15j87lPvCH2fi6S6qm1qRNIFbboeYjS6tcq/f5NAu6z+WAvH2TvWDE ee0ScNbbtxwoFguMWOWmP7BHJA0XNL9YjP3cN3ksuOodweb+C8/I1/kizeEN9j3oHzlv omqnstAccbd8gjKdYxgx4mAygZMlQ1NJfegLI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=inIdPCV2ETE12Pe93u8yG5ExYXnf51ia5FfLCDk8Or8duEFtBbfuZ52etq/66+HZwk tWMszQcjBED3OSIqtHCXbrMQHiILDh+RmyiiIZIaQ05Zr8CERs+QhLIgGkDskJCMUCBW DmXwtEjgbb2ILeiQSKEotyCszQSfKOfeuWqDs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.50.195 with SMTP id e3mr483170pbo.239.1302791430513; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.50.102 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:30:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:30:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB's advantages over MongoDB From: Joel Lucsy To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec544ecee6ea31204a0e1c4dd X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec544ecee6ea31204a0e1c4dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2011/4/14 Daniel Itabora=ED > Crash Proof durability (not having to replicate to achieve durability as > a best practice) > Latest version of MongoDB has a durability switch that should effectively mimic CouchDB's crash protection, tho implemented completely differently. Its more of a rollback if the change journal is present. --bcaec544ecee6ea31204a0e1c4dd--