Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimJwbqRkOYjNqtZMak+ywx7OkTLaH628y5Td5VD@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimJwbqRkOYjNqtZMak+ywx7OkTLaH628y5Td5VD@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:23:28 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTin80y2VgcE44Wfbr1YvEL-zFWV+ixA_zAhqYRTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Replicating, should number of docs be equal in both
 source/destination db's?
From: Nicholas Orr <nicholas.orr@zxgen.net>
To: user <user@couchdb.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ok I did a push this time from v1.0.1 to v1.0.2 and the doc_count is the sa=
me :)

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Nicholas Orr <nicholas.orr@zxgen.net> wrot=
e:
> I've replicated a database from v1.0.1 to v1.0.2 and below are the
> stats I get back when accessing these databases
> (http://localhost:5901/stackpdfa_quotes &
> http://localhost:5902/stackpdfa_quotes)
>
> v1.0.2 {
> =A0 "db_name": "stackpdfa_quotes",
> =A0 "doc_count": 32888,
> =A0 "doc_del_count": 16,
> =A0 "update_seq": 32904,
> =A0 "purge_seq": 0,
> =A0 "compact_running": false,
> =A0 "disk_size": 219832420,
> =A0 "instance_start_time": "1297910393331518",
> =A0 "disk_format_version": 5,
> =A0 "committed_update_seq": 32904
> }
>
> v1.0.1 {
> =A0 "db_name": "stackpdfa_quotes",
> =A0 "doc_count": 33987,
> =A0 "doc_del_count": 17,
> =A0 "update_seq": 34117,
> =A0 "purge_seq": 0,
> =A0 "compact_running": false,
> =A0 "disk_size": 229212260,
> =A0 "instance_start_time": "1297908863487064",
> =A0 "disk_format_version": 5,
> =A0 "committed_update_seq": 34117
> }
>
> While replicating to 1.0.2 couchdb crashed twice with only
> "Segmentation fault" in the log. after the 2nd seg fault i compacted
> the db on the source node, v1.0.1, and then replicated again and the
> replicator says all good...
>
> My question is what has happened to the 699 additional documents that
> v1.0.1 reports to have, that v1.0.2 says don't exist??
>
> Here is what the replicator says on v1.0.2 when I pull replicate
>
> [
> =A0 {
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "session_id": "f22fbdfc3a69b30664530f4e01e4d2aa",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "start_time": "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:43:37 GMT",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "end_time": "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:44:41 GMT",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "start_last_seq": 19882,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "end_last_seq": 34117,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "recorded_seq": 34117,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "missing_checked": 0,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "missing_found": 13020,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "docs_read": 13020,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "docs_written": 13020,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "doc_write_failures": 0
> =A0 },
> =A0 {
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "session_id": "30dfa60cdc2280eb5414df303629ad34",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "start_time": "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:38:27 GMT",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "end_time": "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:38:41 GMT",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "start_last_seq": 19175,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "end_last_seq": 19882,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "recorded_seq": 19882,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "missing_checked": 0,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "missing_found": 6853,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "docs_read": 2909,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "docs_written": 709,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "doc_write_failures": 0
> =A0 },
> =A0 {
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "session_id": "35135bb220243418e65c27f5f90b3b29",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "start_time": "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:30:46 GMT",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "end_time": "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:32:14 GMT",
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "start_last_seq": 0,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "end_last_seq": 19175,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "recorded_seq": 19175,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "missing_checked": 0,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "missing_found": 24071,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "docs_read": 21375,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "docs_written": 19175,
> =A0 =A0 =A0 "doc_write_failures": 0
> =A0 }
> ]
>
> which according that says everything is ok, still curious why the
> databases don't have the same amount of documents...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nicholas
>