Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50716 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2010 08:48:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Dec 2010 08:48:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 94036 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 08:48:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 93800 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2010 08:48:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 93792 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2010 08:48:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:48:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ido.ran@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-iw0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:48:04 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so3169496iwn.11 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:47:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=dlrgNq+m4WjU8UxA6VUSgHhQ25ASe7KM0ARjPajXiec=; b=phvggHpnSenGLVuUOeUay4v9zhHgGfK3UQGmRgcLHaH6DglaVxpRlkyI1zyUCjs90k HK05cH+od+zV+T7Zcgjr23S8Jw2S8IC+/nC7wxlzB4/witDesBZFe0zn6X1FhwRJJzce z/HDnxrAa6CDot5wJWeRX0k5CXwHg1PqrzIRg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=GqCpth60IYpVXnxaY/WTktT77tMtRGxo1F91WC9M5JaWmRJK0dHs85b3o2vczhTBrN Az+Lej8UaecAF7gYznLVjZtxu2QTMzumuZrgTOqB9weUldzR7glAwNba2NhRoxnnlTnc mA4R9KuR9uU4TUFtYZ2Z/ihYRIX5kONAY87HA= Received: by 10.231.31.131 with SMTP id y3mr3494119ibc.179.1292834863381; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:47:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.186.205 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:47:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D0E8FDC.2010705@meetinghouse.net> References: <4D0E8FDC.2010705@meetinghouse.net> From: Ido Ran Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:47:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Document model of network To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032557a34ec8fd6d0497d392cf --00032557a34ec8fd6d0497d392cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thank you very much for the great info. I agree that the the requirements I have are most important to select database that fits. Ido On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Nils Breunese wrote: > >> I'm not familiar with neo4j, but it appears they have full support for >> transactions: http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Transactions You'd have to >> talk to the neo4j people to learn more about this. >> >> > You might want to do a google search on "graph database" - there seem to be > a number of new developments re. large-scale, distributed, RESTful beasts in > that category. In addition to neo4j, infogrid seems to pop up a lot ( > http://infogrid.org/). > > > -- > In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. > In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra > > > --00032557a34ec8fd6d0497d392cf--