Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of darjus@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=xtWEWUudjvO/rgKPW8KwFiqIerTnWPEc0yQX+Hn1PC7Xqw5TzGgTzJ+GoncBiUTZ7f
         /C8ydwc0M83aXc8SmQXKcijOn5oH3s9zn1N4exeDhWJ9yjh7exuqzC1qiYV2Q3GmlPz0
         PbxlVQoqVwJiql5puh29mqIVVRIZnSc1bjmnw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=RN+KqpZ5ntX5ihfsH9Fk+Vo=dnXDm9WBL6jHe@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=RN+KqpZ5ntX5ihfsH9Fk+Vo=dnXDm9WBL6jHe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:00:38 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTingtpVsT9_iVsXDx5s7ghBmJt+eqzoga-ix0HxL@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Replicated db copy takes 2 times more space
From: Darjus Loktevic <darjus@gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Nevermind, it actually shrunk a few minutes later. Sorry.

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Darjus Loktevic <darjus@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I've been playing with CouchDB and found something very disturbing for
> me. I have a database with 1.5M documents, i decided to make a backup
> and created a new database, then replicated from the original. The end
> result was that original weights 0.9GB but the replica is 2.5GB! Each
> document has only 1 revision and I'm running 0.12a. I've also tried
> compaction, but nothing changes.
>
> Is this expected behavior and if so, can someone point me at a
> document on why could this be?
>
> Thanks!
> DL
>