Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38189 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2010 10:37:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Oct 2010 10:37:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 96535 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 10:37:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 96358 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2010 10:37:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 96349 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2010 10:37:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:37:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elf2001@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.180] (HELO mail-qy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.216.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:37:05 +0000 Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so567982qyk.11 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:36:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ahzDF3BmNJ4Xz3Y/lrRw/xN6J+Ewl7LhKPy3l4VqltQ=; b=AZswhQPazK2vTd1oCcd+XV6W5Xrx9gOvWnugow26sT0z1mL7vCpMXBvuCXmABW4xPZ /4TDP7MDc6DrbH/HVDYACyYz6cr+mmdm8+x1ZQNoTgJ5S0h6O5xt2Wt7zDyxirYpzlUr cpmGUc2iuzYYFfxilmEuTDsltZM0E/2LbPj5o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oIig8AjilY0d7PRvfbXRKPlf4tGCEiglBOTgL41pKewIYeTnhy6Y/9t04aQOjDjv/I DGLFcgiFe5FQzz/LfCEvGqqOiQbSlwLr99dSaX9D8vyLB4eO98Kvhknt5nJuCUQJ7BHv A47wRyamyK8yOqT+SRecwEyRB2tEdUnmpNqxo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.86.170 with SMTP id s42mr144047qal.222.1286447800218; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.21.6 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 03:36:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:36:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: view response with duplicate id's From: Alexey Loshkarev To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Haha! Fresh replication (into new database) eliminates duplicates and I can sleep quietly. 2010/10/7 Alexey Loshkarev : > P.S. dmesg doesn't show any hardware problems (bad blocks, segfaults > and so on). > P.P.S. I think, I was migrate 0.10.1 -> 1.0.1 without database > replication, so it may be my fault. > > 2010/10/7 Alexey Loshkarev : >> I think, this is database file corruption. Query _all_docs returns me >> a lot of duplicates (about 3.000 duplicates in ~350.000-documents >> database). >> >> >> [12:17:48 root@node2 (~)]# curl >> http://localhost:5984/exhaust/_all_docs > all_docs >> =A0% Total =A0 =A0% Received % Xferd =A0Average Speed =A0 Time =A0 =A0Ti= me =A0 =A0 Time =A0Current >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Dload = =A0Upload =A0 Total =A0 Spent =A0 =A0Left =A0Speed >> 100 37.7M =A0 =A00 37.7M =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 0 =A01210k =A0 =A0 =A00 --:--:= -- =A00:00:31 --:--:-- =A0943k >> [12:18:23 root@node2 (~)]# wc -l all_docs >> 325102 all_docs >> [12:18:27 root@node2 (~)]# uniq all_docs |wc -l >> 322924 >> >> >> Node1 has duplicates too, but very small amount: >> [12:18:48 root@node1 (~)]# curl >> http://localhost:5984/exhaust/_all_docs > all_docs >> =A0% Total =A0 =A0% Received % Xferd =A0Average Speed =A0 Time =A0 =A0Ti= me =A0 =A0 Time =A0Current >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Dload = =A0Upload =A0 Total =A0 Spent =A0 =A0Left =A0Speed >> 100 38.6M =A0 =A00 38.6M =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 0 =A0 693k =A0 =A0 =A00 --:--:= -- =A00:00:57 --:--:-- 55809 >> [12:19:57 root@node1 (~)]# wc -l all_docs >> 332714 all_docs >> [12:20:54 root@node1 (~)]# uniq all_docs |wc -l >> 332523 >> >> >> >> 2010/10/7 Alexey Loshkarev : >>> I can't say what specific it may be, so let dive into history of this >>> database(s). >>> >>> First (before a 5-6 weeks) it was node2 server with couchdb v10.1. >>> There was testing database on it. There were alot of structural >>> changes, view updates and so on. >>> Than it becomes production and starts working ok. >>> Than we realize we need backup, and best - online backup (as we have >>> couchdb we can do this). >>> So, there appears node1 server with couchdb 1.0.1. I replicated node2 >>> to node1, than initiates continuous replication node1 -> node2 and >>> node2 -> node1. All clients works with node2 only. All works fine >>> about a month. >>> Few days before we was at peak load, so I'v want to use node1 and >>> node2 simultaneously. This was done by round-robin on DNS (host db >>> returns 2 different IP - node1's ip and node2's IP). All works fine >>> about 5 minutes, than I gave first conflict (view queues/all returns >>> two identical documents, one - actual version, second - conflicted >>> revision, document with field _conflict=3D"....."). Document ID was >>> q_tsentr. >>> As I don't has conflict resolver yet, I resolves conflict manually by >>> deleting conflicted revision. I'v also disables round-robin and move >>> all load to node2 to avoid conflicts for a while to wrote conflict >>> resolver. >>> >>> It works ok (node1 and node2 in mutual replications, active load on >>> node2) till yesterday. >>> Yesterday operator call me he has duplicate data in program. At this >>> queues/all returns 1 duplicated document - the same as few days before >>> (id =3D q_tsentr). One row consists of actual document version, another >>> row consists of old revision with field _conflicted_revision=3D"some ol= d >>> revision". >>> >>> I tried to delete this revision but without success. GET for >>> q_tsentr?rev=3D"some old revision" returns valid document. DELETE >>> q_tsentr?rev=3D"some old revision" gaves me 409 error. >>> Here are log files (node2): >>> >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:17:19 GMT] [info] [<0.7239.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:17:30 GMT] [info] [<0.7245.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:17:35 GMT] [info] [<0.7287.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:17:43 GMT] [info] [<0.7345.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:18:02 GMT] [info] [<0.7864.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'DELETE' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 >>> 409 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:18:29 GMT] [info] [<0.8331.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:18:39 GMT] [info] [<0.8363.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'DELETE' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 >>> 409 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:38:19 GMT] [info] [<0.16765.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:40:40 GMT] [info] [<0.17337.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:40:45 GMT] [info] [<0.17344.1462>] 10.0.0.41 - - >>> 'DELETE' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 >>> 404 >>> >>> Logs at node1: >>> >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:17:46 GMT] [info] [<0.25979.462>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:17:56 GMT] [info] [<0.26002.462>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'DELETE' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 >>> 200 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:21:25 GMT] [info] [<0.27133.462>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'DELETE' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3Dall 404 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:21:49 GMT] [info] [<0.27179.462>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'DELETE' /exhaust/q_tsentr?revs=3Dtrue 404 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:24:41 GMT] [info] [<0.28959.462>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'DELETE' /exhaust/q_tsentr?revs=3Dtrue 404 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:38:07 GMT] [info] [<0.10362.463>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?revs=3Dall 404 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:38:23 GMT] [info] [<0.10534.463>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:40:25 GMT] [info] [<0.12014.463>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'GET' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 20= 0 >>> [Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:40:33 GMT] [info] [<0.12109.463>] 10.20.20.13 - - >>> 'DELETE' /exhaust/q_tsentr?rev=3D27144-f516ac68e697874eef9c7562f3e2e229 >>> 404 >>> >>> So, I deletes this document and creates new one (id - q_tsentr2). >>> It will works fine about hour. >>> >>> Node2 has undeletable duplicate, so I move all clients to node1. There >>> were now such problem, view response was correct. >>> >>> Than I tried to recover database at node2. I stops, deletes view index >>> files and start couchdb again. Than i ping all view to recreate index. >>> At the end ot this procedure, i saw duplicates of identical rows (see >>> first letter in this thread). Node1 has no such problems, so I stops >>> replication, leave load on node1 and go for crying into this maillist. >>> >>> >>> 2010/10/6 Paul Davis : >>>> It was noted on IRC that I should give a bit more explanation. >>>> >>>> With the information that you've provided there are two possible >>>> explanations. Either your client code is not doing what you expect or >>>> you've triggered a really crazy bug in the view indexer that caused it >>>> to reindex a database without invalidating a view and not removing >>>> keys for docs when it reindexed. >>>> >>>> Given that no one has reported anything remotely like this and I can't >>>> immediately see a code path that would violate so many behaviours in >>>> the view updater, I'm leaning towards this being an issue in the >>>> client code. >>>> >>>> If there was something specific that changed since the view worked, >>>> that might illuminate what could cause this sort of behaviour if it is >>>> indeed a bug in CouchDB. >>>> >>>> HTH, >>>> Paul Davis >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Alexey Loshkarev = wrote: >>>>> I have such view function (map only, without reduce) >>>>> >>>>> function(doc) { >>>>> =A0if (doc.type =3D=3D "queue") { >>>>> =A0 =A0emit(doc.ordering, doc.drivers); >>>>> =A0} >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> It works perfect till yesterday, but today it start return duplicates >>>>> Example: >>>>> $ curl http://node2:5984/exhaust/_design/queues/_view/all >>>>> >>>>> {"total_rows":46,"offset":0,"rows":[ >>>>> {"id":"q_mashinyi-v-gorode","key":0,"value":["d_mironets_ivan","d_sme= rtin_ivan","d_kasyanenko_sergej","d_chabotar_aleksandr","d_martyinenko_yuri= j","d_krikunenko_aleksandr"]}, >>>>> {"id":"q_mashinyi-v-gorode","key":0,"value":["d_mironets_ivan","d_sme= rtin_ivan","d_kasyanenko_sergej","d_chabotar_aleksandr","d_martyinenko_yuri= j","d_krikunenko_aleksandr"]}, >>>>> {"id":"q_mashinyi-v-gorode","key":0,"value":["d_mironets_ivan","d_sme= rtin_ivan","d_kasyanenko_sergej","d_chabotar_aleksandr","d_martyinenko_yuri= j","d_krikunenko_aleksandr"]}, >>>>> ...... >>>>> {"id":"q_oblasnaya","key":2,"value":["d_kramarenko_viktor","d_skorodz= ievskij_eduard"]}, >>>>> {"id":"q_oblasnaya","key":2,"value":["d_kramarenko_viktor","d_skorodz= ievskij_eduard"]}, >>>>> {"id":"q_oblasnaya","key":2,"value":["d_kramarenko_viktor","d_skorodz= ievskij_eduard"]}, >>>>> ........ >>>>> {"id":"q_otstoj","key":11,"value":["d_gavrilenko_aleksandr","d_klishn= ev_sergej"]} >>>>> ]} >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I tried to restart server, recreate view (remove view index file), >>>>> compact view and database and none of this helps, it still returns >>>>> duplicates. >>>>> What happens? How to avoid it in the future? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ---------------- >>>>> Best regards >>>>> Alexey Loshkarev >>>>> mailto:elf2001@gmail.com >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ---------------- >>> Best regards >>> Alexey Loshkarev >>> mailto:elf2001@gmail.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> ---------------- >> Best regards >> Alexey Loshkarev >> mailto:elf2001@gmail.com >> > > > > -- > ---------------- > Best regards > Alexey Loshkarev > mailto:elf2001@gmail.com > --=20 ---------------- Best regards Alexey Loshkarev mailto:elf2001@gmail.com