Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54183 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2010 05:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Sep 2010 05:42:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 61674 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2010 05:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 61383 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2010 05:42:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 61375 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2010 05:42:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 05:42:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of tjgillies@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.180] (HELO mail-yx0-f180.google.com) (209.85.213.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 05:42:16 +0000 Received: by yxi11 with SMTP id 11so1627909yxi.11 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=S7N/nlMt7JsnBNyng11ubkavBJ7eFbk9k34stG9QY5Y=; b=gNqAzdN/C4Yu0sRx45K7wr72prDUtUOgTiwcSv6eDFcLGzrXUKYfMxg5L2GzSWKsHd xZgzefbxmKhhiSMyyjxoBtJpdscJ1yEdHVEcGDduOkLKwBdl7ISdmLGgHi38zF/bskTl U74qyh6WpgE5reYIvKZPUOgNrOEDuUAt7OFgw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=sN2XgetwQ5y0Jn2S8aepkdElZGk9Eky+nfp4X09DEWX1KqybdHJmUc5szk7gHvLuXp fNnakBMEWQrwZuoXFrOc/dCQ8/dqv8LqRsFr77N4GWs4Ttyvw/DJ9npggxcfhc7/DXqE dG4a4oiFnzYw8i9OowQLW8Jio9O7Rra4V6alY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.92.6 with SMTP id p6mr3979710agb.66.1284788515166; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tjgillies@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.235.8 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:41:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 22:41:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 912CoY6J0QPbLMwK_QFYnAll1s0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: req argument in view From: Tyler Gillies To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361e89300eda9604908223f2 --0016361e89300eda9604908223f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Tyler Gillies wrote: > Why don't views have a req argument? > [10PM:33:19] map/reduce functions have to be pure [10PM:34:32] views are precomputed and stored so they cant change based on request data -- http://www.readwriteweb.com/about#tyler My website: http://list.pdxbrain.com --0016361e89300eda9604908223f2--