Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32749 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2010 16:38:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 Sep 2010 16:38:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 42130 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2010 16:38:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 42080 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2010 16:38:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 42072 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2010 16:38:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:38:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wickedgrey@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.180] (HELO mail-gy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.160.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:38:36 +0000 Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so37990gyf.11 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:38:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VJQEbzb9kYzwbJLYKSdg1b1E0WNCg/Cqw+BkdT1Pvuc=; b=v13lWMhkL6ScPmUbyTbjnp1SlPqTUMqIJMGUVAreCFWyAJm3vwa4QPVZHnNzls33xp fMeiJgEAWmVO9nADWWO/j7ADI8PqQJHrD5fI0iaosIerVt3z6K+MXDENQKNdSAtutAhb RXJh76dXxnSsEQgFaoLJZQTK1R0T6PBcg5guU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ds/ovdq7VfON2zx8tsJ5IozrFMikZ4/2LTMpqk0pLrZAHOYPjnAjHm++QT1sRLYcat nVoLry3cXlDA0fmFh1bZzpXLstncv3qOUYXibeQOtGkzpNhkAzhB7p4ZoKUUEAumsSMv 50KbSXG3t+mkoGmEmMM7aC+9roj0WnJiWD3bM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.11.9 with SMTP id 9mr1361274ybk.295.1285173494875; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.227.2 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:38:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:38:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: security & attachments & replication & hashing From: "Eli Stevens (Gmail)" To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote: > Exposing the md5 hash in attachment properties is more or less > trivial, but not yet done. Ticket 687 was more or less forgotten > (nobody else asked for the feature or commented on it). > > Please, leave your comment there and/or vote for it. > I'll implement it if nobody else has votes against the feature. > > Thanks for "resurrecting" the ticket. I would find having an md5 sum of the uncompressed data present in the _attachments info to be very useful (I just found and voted for the ticket). Just lending my vocal support for the idea, since there didn't seem to be much already. :) Eli