Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robert.newson@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=BHf3U5qB8yCSQ57vcRV9wTgtzMPhyuFoG+FQzqbG+qS6ayjPTTpM7fw38om/sjMTEK
         rFN06K+MWrkRD4zE2XL6luKEUlKyLwfsp6cEltnXVptGO6b66jtN5rh0lJ/PpP+dtno/
         5OiDOT1MV5DkdkYEByntMvd0PfBEgrfHd77qs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <117033.599.qm@web111516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <117033.599.qm@web111516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:04:33 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinHRimjhdV9mvFdyG+YWi2=WetDSbT=BV_tfFM4@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cannot search single terms in Couchdb-lucene (maybe Analyzer
	problems)
From: Robert Newson <robert.newson@gmail.com>
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Can you paste the "fulltext" section of the related design document
and also name the version of c-l you are using?

Thanks,
B.

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Timothy Washington
<timothyjwashington@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Our team is using couchdb-lucene. We have the tool installed, configured and
> indexing properly. And our full field searching works properly.
>
>
> But if we want to search for one one word in a field ('title', or 'summary', for
> example), we get no results. So, on a document with the title "WHAT DO YOU WEAR
> TO GLAM UP YOUR LOOK FOR A SPECIAL EVENT?", document A) works, but B) does not.
>
>
> A) wget 'http://172.16.114.129:5984/baron/_fti/_design/foo/by_all?q=title:WHAT
> DO YOU WEAR TO GLAM UP YOUR LOOK FOR A SPECIAL EVENT?'
> B) wget 'http://172.16.114.129:5984/baron/_fti/_design/foo/by_all?q=title:GLAM'
>
>
> We're playing around with the settings - a different index analyzer maybe? But
> I'm sure we're just missing a basic switch/lever somewhere. Anyone have any
> knowledge here?
>
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
>