From user-return-11873-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Wed Aug 04 19:27:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70279 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2010 19:27:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Aug 2010 19:27:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 28777 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2010 19:27:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 28599 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2010 19:27:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 28591 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2010 19:27:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:27:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of randall.leeds@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.52] (HELO mail-qw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.216.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:27:31 +0000 Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so4675692qwf.11 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:27:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MeonCw2m3vfJFJMvokykOc1yWE0OeMNX//ZM98gyIW8=; b=LV1sjZcgChURUqYLwn5kPNFgBQ/W3Jih/kPkZA6wYsOezFr62AvuetlI5tVND/4T+P plzVMVZKa+ZzZp8KV59BAYkXG/eNYxXO8DF931NvYgD00icrF74776gQ7jcbT1dv2zse kyAHF+VjUhtmBeQlsOcZgZZNWADw4iXpoUF4c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=VuMzvsO82y6aeB6xckZ5VcgK/3vis9AYWRQuoUI7jNYEZd9NYiICqCy7YEVvBOWx5Q PXP0T7rE6KpgfVqfesEXstOQacyygnih1aXOyNQB7uacugzpePIwcqe1pPw5+fXFaLqK ulVT/VntwFDkjrkhLca1RCwhbd0q8cgq/XrKM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.34.212 with SMTP id m20mr4006078qad.397.1280950026820; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:27:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.235.131 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:27:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:27:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB Replication Failure - odd db_not_found errors From: Randall Leeds To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It may be that you just had too many replications spun up at once for your configuration settings. Have you read through http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Performance#Resource_Limits ? On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:38, Chris Stockton wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Chris Stockton > wrote: >> I am having a strange issue that I am stuck and unsure how to further > > For anyone who gets similar errors, I was unable to find root cause > for this. It seemed to happen when I fired up our replicator, which > spins up about 4 thousand replication jobs. My only thought is it was > over-loaded. I ended deleting all dbs, reinstalling couchdb, deleting > all lib files etc. Basically a fresh couchdb build. I then replicated > the databases one by one. I spun up the replicator, which basically > does status checks and makes sure continuous replication is running on > all machines before I went home last night and despite hours of errors > they dwindled down until all databases were replicating correctly. > > Moral to story, if replication isn't working with similar errors, fix > might be to wipe all databases, then single pass replicate (or rsync) > all databases before firing up continuous. > > -Chris >