On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:37 AM, faust 1111 wrote: >>Why not just use the attachment name as the document id? > Docs name can be not uniq. If you mean the attachment names aren't unique, how were you going to attach them all to a single couch doc? > 2010/8/13 Mark J. Reed : >> Why not just use the attachment name as the document id?  You could >> double it up or just use an unchanging name for the actual Couch >> attachment identifier, e.g. >> >> /docs/mycoolattachment1/content >> /docs/anotherniftyattachment/content >> ... >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:23 AM, faust 1111 wrote: >>> Yes it's possible but each time when i put attachment i must create >>> new doc and remember doc id +attachment_name >>> if i keep all attachments in one doc i can remember only >>> attachment_name, its simple. >>> >>> >>> 2010/8/13 Noah Slater : >>>> What about a separate db for your attachments, with one attachment per doc? >>>> >>>> On 13 Aug 2010, at 12:03, faust 1111 wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi guy's. >>>>> I have idea keep all attachments in separate db, separate from docs >>>>> (its allow me replicate only docs without attachments), >>>>> and in doc save link to attachment in separate db. >>>>> >>>>> is it possible put many(100 000) big attachments to single doc? >>>>> Thanks for help! >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mark J. Reed >> > -- Mark J. Reed