couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From faust 1111 <faust...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is it good idea put many(100 000) big attachments to single doc?
Date Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:37:27 GMT
>Why not just use the attachment name as the document id?
Docs name can be not uniq.



2010/8/13 Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com>:
> Why not just use the attachment name as the document id?  You could
> double it up or just use an unchanging name for the actual Couch
> attachment identifier, e.g.
>
> /docs/mycoolattachment1/content
> /docs/anotherniftyattachment/content
> ...
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:23 AM, faust 1111 <faust451@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes it's possible but each time when i put attachment i must create
>> new doc and remember doc id +attachment_name
>> if i keep all attachments in one doc i can remember only
>> attachment_name, its simple.
>>
>>
>> 2010/8/13 Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org>:
>>> What about a separate db for your attachments, with one attachment per doc?
>>>
>>> On 13 Aug 2010, at 12:03, faust 1111 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guy's.
>>>> I have idea keep all attachments in separate db, separate from docs
>>>> (its allow me replicate only docs without attachments),
>>>> and in doc save link to attachment in separate db.
>>>>
>>>> is it possible put many(100 000) big attachments to single doc?
>>>> Thanks for help!
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com>
>

Mime
View raw message