couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark J. Reed" <markjr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is it good idea put many(100 000) big attachments to single doc?
Date Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:42:02 GMT
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:37 AM, faust 1111 <faust451@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Why not just use the attachment name as the document id?
> Docs name can be not uniq.
If you mean the attachment names aren't unique, how were you going to
attach them all to a single couch doc?

> 2010/8/13 Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com>:
>> Why not just use the attachment name as the document id?  You could
>> double it up or just use an unchanging name for the actual Couch
>> attachment identifier, e.g.
>>
>> /docs/mycoolattachment1/content
>> /docs/anotherniftyattachment/content
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:23 AM, faust 1111 <faust451@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yes it's possible but each time when i put attachment i must create
>>> new doc and remember doc id +attachment_name
>>> if i keep all attachments in one doc i can remember only
>>> attachment_name, its simple.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/8/13 Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org>:
>>>> What about a separate db for your attachments, with one attachment per doc?
>>>>
>>>> On 13 Aug 2010, at 12:03, faust 1111 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guy's.
>>>>> I have idea keep all attachments in separate db, separate from docs
>>>>> (its allow me replicate only docs without attachments),
>>>>> and in doc save link to attachment in separate db.
>>>>>
>>>>> is it possible put many(100 000) big attachments to single doc?
>>>>> Thanks for help!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com>
>>
>



-- 
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com>

Mime
View raw message