SVN commit r954043 looks suspicious. Digging further.
-Damien
On Aug 7, 2010, at 10:31 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
> On Aug 7, 2010, at 1:21 AM, Sascha Reuter wrote:
>
>> Thats exactly what I reported 2 days ago! Bug is already opened and databasefile
was provided to the couchio guys! Running on Linux...
>>
>
> Thanks, we're keenly interested in seeing what's going on here.
>
> Chris
>
>> Am 07.08.2010 um 06:37 schrieb J Chris Anderson <jchris@apache.org>:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 6, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Yue Chuan Lim wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry to reply myself so quickly.
>>>>
>>>> Peeking inside the .couch file and searching for the documents I have
>>>> missing turn up results. Offhand I am noticing 4 instances of the string
>>>> gsc_test_03. Which is ID of the document I am missing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are on Windows? Perhaps this is an issue with the windows file handling.
>>>
>>> Can you comment on this bug, and also save those .couch files in case we need
to analyze them?
>>>
>>> Corruption like this should be impossible, but this is the second case we've
heard lately, so I'm guessing it is a Windows issue.
>>>
>>> Please comment on this bug with information about your machine enviroment (OS,
Filesystem, Disk size, etc)
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-844
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Yue Chuan Lim <shasderias@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a set of documents that have been committed for more then a day,
>>>>> regularly read from without a problem. Had to stop the database service
to
>>>>> do some debugging, used the couchdb.bat provided in CouchDB/bin for easy
>>>>> access to the log. And I noticed that I basically lost all the documents
in
>>>>> question.
>>>>>
>>>>> There does not appear to be corruption per se, but it is as if my database
>>>>> just rolled back to the state it was in a few days ago, i.e. most of
my
>>>>> documents are there but some old documents that I'm pretty sure I have
>>>>> deleted are back, and my newer documents are gone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Appears to have happened to me more then once, shrugged it off the last
>>>>> time as it might be just a mix up, but I am definite that my database
has
>>>>> certainly rolled back this time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any situation in which this might happen?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Yue Chuan
>>>>>
>>>
>
|