Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of luke.driscoll@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.160.52 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=gX1z0NjDo+swME9kqEXrbHfJ64FlKvUHUmaQTaIaMF0RpOoBeJ1636LwCzc0jEKdYM
         ib6IM1ZxuAQWOwZd6g/JM05b7+Upp3QbsfYEFYmb1yWrdjqjzFn/3bhZkLFNLvp0GDK2
         sxUp4WHXqdEAm6a8TyCXbtDVRZ0u15KXWsYA8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B56ADD86-576F-491E-A582-EBBC681ED1DB@googlemail.com>
References: <454008.53442.qm@web31810.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <B56ADD86-576F-491E-A582-EBBC681ED1DB@googlemail.com>
From: Luke Driscoll <luke.driscoll@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:50:06 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinczeTL_gaIPy9ogQGrKjLv1Zvw9LB9HvAyFFb8@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: View Efficency
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636b145bd06cc4f048a2b857c

--001636b145bd06cc4f048a2b857c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

One of the reasons that I have not been using couchdb-lucene is that it
doesn't seem to allow us to use the reduce functionality of a view, and that
the results are just the documents.  Am I way off in this statement?

Luke

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:38, Sebastian Cohnen <
sebastiancohnen@googlemail.com> wrote:

> in that case, you want the power of a search engine like lucene/solr. you
> should definitely have a look at couchdb-lucene.
>
> You wrote in another reply:
> > but we are querying through multiple document "keys" not key contents!
> and we are not bios toward
> > full-text indexers for now in this project.
>
> you can actually define very precisely what you want to have indexed by
> lucene, may it be only one key, or everything down to attachments.
>
>
> On 29.06.2010, at 15:10, Behrad Zari wrote:
>
> > It's AND-logic. I read my post again and found that I've written "OR"
> > mistakenly.
> >
> > Actually talking, we are gonna filter results that are starting with
> > key[i]=val[i] AND starting with key[j]=val[j]
> > (our searches use startkey and endkey to filter doc ranges)
> > So, we may emit compound/array keys:  [key1, ...] to simulate AND-logic.
> >
> > I get your idea Sebastian, but CouchDB is preferred to do the actual
> filtering
> > (unity of all _byKey view results) since each of  returned rows from the
> server
> > may contain huge number of results! and this is not an efficient solution
> > instead of a MAY-BE-EXISTING serverside solution. (based on B+trees)
> >
> > --Behrad
> >
> >
>
>

--001636b145bd06cc4f048a2b857c--