Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21603 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2010 16:18:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 18 Apr 2010 16:18:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 31602 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2010 16:18:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 31548 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2010 16:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 31540 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2010 16:18:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:18:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of misterpib@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.172] (HELO mail-qy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.221.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:18:39 +0000 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so4291580qyk.0 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:18:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=CcxpaBE4b1uc4Vi0HYdWeznR73frqUduyAu/9eyrXdc=; b=e9Pmeo8P0UnaivtpFFk8KyPodMRelpnU2694E3Oq0cQT767nlSlm6fA4v/x0uBtbls milkQxdFmCkC9QmxvOZWeMmjNQqeSxSEyn/HziokWUzvcOERmCg4wCeodLqPaLnYHVtI P36ahstANdn8yTC7wplWem3fgu78aekJLRo+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=F93Wmn83lI7wylAcwqqTZqXbMRPO0Qs0Ieb7uDCIxurzxjx+VF1GsDm0M4LlWa+zbG 21qWqeHI+NxTkpGF8x04TLYFD2Dn3s4DX7RcUfh44LyqRF9RbbKs7p7nrPQOsq0Mw5lT mGLtrWm7502tZ8gfJ7rGh6Fwc4idU0wdG/sz0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.96.68 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9AFB5212-C996-4FA7-9ACB-6EE228E59223@me.com> From: Paul Bonser Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:17:58 -0500 Received: by 10.229.96.82 with SMTP id g18mr1906757qcn.82.1271607498128; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ezra doesn't recommend CouchDB To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364270fe383efd0484853161 --0016364270fe383efd0484853161 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Has anyone written to him to ask that he clarify why he doesn't recommend it? On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Michael Genereux wrote: > He says it "falls over in production". I would take that to mean that > either it has a 20/80 problem like Rails used to (some would argue > still does) or that once it's in production use, some steep decline in > performance as real load of the web starts hammering it for data. The > only short coming I've had thus far is ad-hoc bulk data manipulation. > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Niket Patel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Today, I was watching http://vimeo.com/10838794 ( Skip to 16.00 minutes > ) > > Ezra just discarded CouchDB and not recommend for any production use. He > never tried to explain what those issues and why he doesn't recommend. > > > > But I would like to know views of CouchDB community despite the fact that > he doesn't gave any reasons. this is his own preference but he is smart ruby > hacker, he should have reasons. > > > > Niket > > > -- Paul Bonser http://probablyprogramming.com --0016364270fe383efd0484853161--