Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mgenereu@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=HCDhAtfUvyI7fZ22xKCORCwIPD6d83Vh3/3Z+to1rM2GL7dHpRy0wSdMRyhKH3/MQu
         FAoQEXFj4dWoB8sXynLDq16HRhIQx915q8+xypC9xVGXobGFcEuoz3mt6HmXLSycgFuX
         YOgsczEk9sSK4c6HGvUW7kW4jZV16xRKQxcGM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9AFB5212-C996-4FA7-9ACB-6EE228E59223@me.com>
References: <9AFB5212-C996-4FA7-9ACB-6EE228E59223@me.com>
From: Michael Genereux <mgenereu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:45:19 -0700
Message-ID: <u2pe2f5da511004180245jc7c661catfa2fc58117b9e0ca@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ezra doesn't recommend CouchDB
To: user@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

He says it "falls over in production".  I would take that to mean that
either it has a 20/80 problem like Rails used to (some would argue
still does) or that once it's in production use, some steep decline in
performance as real load of the web starts hammering it for data.  The
only short coming I've had thus far is ad-hoc bulk data manipulation.

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Niket Patel <nexneo@me.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, I was watching http://vimeo.com/10838794 ( Skip to 16.00 minutes )
> Ezra just discarded CouchDB and not recommend for any production use. He never tried to explain what those issues and why he doesn't recommend.
>
> But I would like to know views of CouchDB community despite the fact that he doesn't gave any reasons. this is his own preference but he is smart ruby hacker, he should have reasons.
>
> Niket
>