couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Sante <>
Subject Re: hypercouch
Date Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:53:44 GMT
Thanks for enlightening me on the status of hypercouch.
I have a separate server with only couchdb+lucene on it, and more than 
enough RAM, so JVM memory usage is not really a issue right now. But 
indeed a wiki page with some tips for "Managing memory usage" would be a 
good idea to learn some tricks if memory usage did ever become a problem.


On 11/04/10 19:42, Paul Davis wrote:
> Tom,
> I abandoned my full text indexing projects once Rob Newson put the
> hammer down on couchdb-lucene. The code is still floating around but
> is hugely lacking compared to couchdb-lucene. I've since always
> recommended every use that because of all that it does.
> As to the JVM, I feel your pain. Though in reality the only reasonable
> complaint is its memory usage. Chatting briefly with Rob it seems that
> there might be tricks to reducing the usage in general if you're
> worried about that. Perhaps a wiki page of "Managing memory usage"
> might be helpful to future users?
> HTH,
> Paul Davis
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Tom Sante<>  wrote:
>> Ok good, Couchdb Lucene it is than, used it before does a great job.
>> I was just curious because I never noticed there was a python option out
>> there eliminating the need for using java.
>> On 11/04/10 18:34, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
>>> I would go with couchdb-lucene. Robert Newson is doing a awesome job on
>>> pushing this thing forward and IMHO it's the best thing we have for FTI with
>>> couchdb...
>>> On 11.04.2010, at 18:31, Tom Sante wrote:
>>>> Hey,
>>>> Is hypercouch still maintained somewhere? or is it best to just use
>>>> Couchdb Lucene instead?
>>>> Tom

View raw message