Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33436 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2010 08:01:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 08:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 99029 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 08:01:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 98624 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2010 08:01:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 98616 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2010 08:01:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:01:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of john2do@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.52] (HELO mail-ww0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:01:31 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so284060wwd.11 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:01:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YAdX9yrwnd2TJGC2jRX9NoFjw8h1yCXhAoiaDDW2Ifg=; b=x8SXk6PFpXYPEKV7yuzYjXLAcj37H+LoXGGXxwQLZUIbhJoOk40dpPxgQmXvgqOexe Y3ySPIAHRh5y35hXyKuMEer7iUstycksx4RfywQVgSA2y8EFvyzJUSwdG3Yujr90efqZ L/1ECLhL7OOjqj6DMBMpCSsC+vYrh/id8RMEo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=oT6ml+pX/YNEOzwpQHJgCRj6ktoqL1qxrVPKrkaPk3HhGyksEr8wMB5Nh56kULKRk1 LYN5MUPOoR5sVvLgFiXEjRs0um974Oh/X3LtGl6zeCHzEG/H0amhm2+q4o6Jz7+uN9hd j/o7pDAaBBc9AX7mriNDpuSLrsSHOsRztJVF0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.86.14 with SMTP id v14mr1341971wee.183.1269417671190; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:01:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:01:11 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: perfomance? From: Vasili Batareykin To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7eb685ce902048287556f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7eb685ce902048287556f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 pipelining? you mean keepalive? ab hold test if you supply -k option (Use HTTP KeepAlive feature) seems that couchdb's httpd don't know about this) yes, throughput(in b/s) is better,but on localhost, if i use same test with nginx i get around 1000 #/sec on 340k file. (344294.81 [Kbytes/sec]). yes, nginx use sendfile for this operation. yes fs cache used too. but 70 #/sec with couchdb ... 2010/3/24 Randall Leeds > If you multiple (#/sec) by file size, are actually getting _better_ > throughput with the larger files. > Do you know if ab command uses HTTP 1.1 pipelining? If not, HTTP > overhead would explain the extra time. > --0016e6d7eb685ce902048287556f--