Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72084 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2010 20:32:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2010 20:32:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 23815 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2010 20:32:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 23774 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2010 20:32:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 23764 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2010 20:32:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:32:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nsteinmetz@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.220] (HELO mail-fx0-f220.google.com) (209.85.220.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:32:36 +0000 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so321266fxm.35 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:32:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eD2m++kPbh+hoMK3SlHHBRlyKmR986DD8rUCx7E6Dt0=; b=mcreYgqIFj/FP4Np7uiYstqGYYsQliHmynFFMYmXVC53sF/i2kIWcElEBcElLYnisv JgkU4R9BBubAmzMMCpCLvLjxfDExv1C+Hqc5dlr5D0S8kUJHgg4stXd1OJgMGuoZtSNP /qGiUuGCoDAHxbqAocSJdnr5rz/FHd6kgnpO8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RS/Ork9ZZYcEDX43e9O5wp+3m/BsMW2qTEE/SFYfjDyKsTomQSBRy1I8VxmqYGnXJ8 uPeJukCaE3Y4VwzQUPvD+kk+5ih3mO687ms7D3t/7SEV98LAO/AQsgvyeCjtB6JmxxKt QCa/afAGRSfzlnUozJNnHDGGrVnF2l0ZjKbUo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.17.70 with SMTP id r6mr6479083faa.22.1263760334801; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:32:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <98a246a11001170752p3d771ea1wbefb02c72476092e@mail.gmail.com> References: <6121f1ea1001170513i319fbbf5jbdc2c341d65e3b5a@mail.gmail.com> <98a246a11001170529x6006e1f5s5f98d815b8a5055d@mail.gmail.com> <6121f1ea1001170619uf00a191k6879a3c78583c3bb@mail.gmail.com> <20100117150309.GA11218@uk.tiscali.com> <98a246a11001170752p3d771ea1wbefb02c72476092e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:32:14 +0100 Message-ID: <6121f1ea1001171232w60a5900r64cb37594e068ff7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Search feature ? From: Nicolas Steinmetz To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015173fe688d64cf2047d622196 --0015173fe688d64cf2047d622196 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, 2010/1/17 Metin Akat > Nicolas, in your particular situation you need full text search. > Nothing less will be satisfactory for you and your users. And in my > opinion setting up couchdb-lucene is easier than writing > "fulltext-like" views for couchdb. Go read the docs here > http://github.com/rnewson/couchdb-lucene/tree/0.4-maint > If you get in trouble, I could try to help you. > I agree that couchdb-lucene would be more efficient. But for one of my project (the tiny CRM app), I was thinking about using CouchDB instead of an existing MS Access DB. As the app is to be run on Windows, I would have liked something really easy to run. The user of this app does not have internet at work, so I would have liked a self contained app instead of having to deploy some java software (jdk+lucene) + ... So for my own app on a server, I'll give a try to couchdb-lucene. For my tiny CRM app, maybe I'll use some pure couchdb code depending on requirements. Thanks for all your replies, Nicolas -- Nicolas Steinmetz http://www.steinmetz.fr - http://nicolas.steinmetz.fr/ --0015173fe688d64cf2047d622196--