From user-return-8431-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Wed Jan 13 14:06:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83938 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 14:06:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 14:06:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 92707 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 14:06:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 92650 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 14:06:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 92634 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 14:06:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:06:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of karel.minarik@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.220 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.220] (HELO mail-fx0-f220.google.com) (209.85.220.220) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:06:40 +0000 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so22898328fxm.35 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:06:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:mime-version:date :x-mailer; bh=GkMycN6LuDeK+weIFpP6GPKcVX6ZAafmOQPCNBb14cg=; b=QEvnvWxtGtOcsK4aM3/FtCS5/cLOnkvsPWcaIZ6oAmszv2cVYVH19Sc7W5WixXp9G5 Cr5RHc46svuTDLH5UtbHbLkYvwYvKufkhEKI+TZzuX7eyUDVU1B9GKRVcgm0obsDXMKP tlbrElPV7/oexp16uKtezhCyJc+EF9lfvf7tA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject :mime-version:date:x-mailer; b=XC6u6VlRBu3mpFkeW1FWx2HIx+T7lcAXreB0RePZF/AdLhkIw2pPB+mWT6Bj/IOzZ4 tAksPorAfzz63Y4453BkSxydfkASaYULmV6ht1ZiENnNC20jCPBXOsZfWdssfC0clNF6 6k/63bqbnm/ZZvi15q6JSbNz9gviO8mgp/pqk= Received: by 10.223.132.204 with SMTP id c12mr12487163fat.32.1263391579398; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:06:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.2.101? ([193.165.135.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm10796400fxm.8.2010.01.13.06.06.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:06:17 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <26C8ECF2-FC37-4641-B5A2-AF8A73F8148D@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Karel_Mina=C5=99=C3=ADk?= To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Measuring duration of view index building Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:06:02 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, I need to give dependable information on how specific indexes for a large dataset (> 6 mil docs) took to build. I know that indices are built upon first hit to view, that I can run curl, etc etc etc. Doing a `time curl ...` in a screen just doesn't sound too convenient for me. So I'd like to ask if there are any best practices out there to solve this. Of course, the best thing in my case would be, if couch itself would log something like "start/end building index for _design/mydoc" -- but as far as I know, there's no way to do that? In that case, how are you measuring such things? Thanks!, Karel