Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54704 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2009 01:49:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2009 01:49:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 8711 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 01:49:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 8642 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 01:49:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 8632 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2009 01:49:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:49:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of daveray@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.190] (HELO mail-iw0-f190.google.com) (209.85.223.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:49:16 +0000 Received: by iwn28 with SMTP id 28so1550183iwn.13 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:48:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=30j/qHXKodA+3NekTvF/pOxPm8K3W1FudZC1SWa0Org=; b=WVeyr0MstYQIOb0GSEAzEsaP5o+n8Dlt2rHkE1bHa1QoHNMDYSNfI+IuWIIUrBirX0 GN+88SAKqlaTRmWT8T2rlzC1eopVJRti4XElxlAQuQU82lshdkWHxqieiRNhov5mgv3N rRK8dWUh9MuvlQo2dr+OoxbxVYWltdrFETdOU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=sgU0ed2GOCxXq3sCy11WZHafb1zsCrEtVQycd/5UMgxGNPxU3HqM6vXGjrIscg+M8l Rh8Vc8bDSoEUVvZoKdip+OnyjIoUnBDGWBJ1I1fuNFS4r3k0REUl5vQJVsHrM4ZYN/mW 08eFsZWlhmKNydDs/Yz4kQTmK9axIxsHQYLVs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.120.90 with SMTP id c26mr474034ibr.1.1259891335455; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:48:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:48:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Documents with many attachments From: Dave Ray To: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi there, Is there any reason in terms of performance, stability, or good taste, that I should avoid adding 100s or 1000s of attachments to a document? I have about 3000 pngs on a document and things seem to work fine (aside from Futon being a little unusable when I view the doc), but if this is going to cause me trouble later I can split it up into multiple docs with single attachments without much more work. Just wondering. Thanks! Dave