On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 21:36, Troy Kruthoff <tkruthoff@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have an app that gets data from a view and then monitors _changes for
> updates. Currently it:
>
> 1) Gets the update_seq from the database
> 2) Gets data from a view
> 3) Connects to _changes since updae_seq from #1
I am doing exactly the same in my application and the gap between #1
and #2 also worried me - a special header sounds like a feasible
solution and I can't see any downside besides the few bytes of
overhead in the header for each request.
regards,
Joscha
|