couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Wolff <>
Subject Re: Help with complex key range query and map/reduce
Date Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:07:36 GMT
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Glenn Rempe <> wrote:

> Thank you Jeremy, Jesse, Adam, and Chris for the responses.  It is really
> very much appreciated.
> Chris, is your concern specifically with what Adam was proposing?  Would
> Jesse's solution be more performant over time and in-line with how CDB
> wants
> to operate?  Or do both of these pose a problem.
The problem is with the use-case, not the data representation (so "both.")
More about reduce limitations here:

One workaround here is to limit the number of values that are emitted in a
given reduce step to, say, the top n. This causes data-loss problems, but is
adequate for some applications.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message