couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 0.9 to 0.10 breaking changes
Date Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:04:48 GMT
> Really the requirement should be less than 1/10th or so (decrease at
> roughly log(N) rate) but I put in 1/2 because it's just a rough rubric
> to catch the worst offenders.

Actually, the really real requirement I think should be
1/values.length because there can be weird cases in the btree
reductions. I never tracked them down, but I ran into it when doing
the Top-N-Tags examples.

HTH,
Paul Davis

Mime
View raw message