On 7 May 2009, at 21:40, Parnell Springmeyer wrote:
>
> I am also in the process (have been for a while) of building an Erlang
> backed triplestore. Not a light undertaking by anymeans and I may be
> using
> CouchDB to build that ontop of it (license permitting).
License* permits :)
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Cheers
Jan
--
>
> CouchDB + RDF = FTW
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Demetrius Nunes <demetriusnunes@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> We are evaluating new technologies for managing semi-structured
>> data and
>> documents in one of our applications. We've got tired of wrestling
>> relational databases for this.
>>
>> I would like to know why would I prefer to use CouchDB instead of a
>> RDF
>> database, such as Sesame ou Mulgara.
>>
>> I know some of the RDF advantages, such as open standards,
>> interoperability,
>> rules engines, semantic queries, community and tool support,
>> maturity, etc.
>>
>> But I really like the simplicity of the CouchDB model.
>>
>> Can anyone enlighten me?
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>> Demetrius
>>
>> --
>> ____________________________
>> http://www.demetriusnunes.com
>>
|