couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Damien Katz <dam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: couchdb attachments vs storing files on fs or s3 like service
Date Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:23:44 GMT
Attachments don't affect general performance except during compaction,  
where the bytes must be copied to a new file. Eventually we'll have a  
binary object plugin, to allow binary objects to be written to  
alternate storage.

-Damien

On Apr 27, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have an application where users will have to upload different media
> with different sizes from picture to video and I currently hesitate
> between allowing them to upload directly in couchdb as attachments or
> just storing on fs or any other system. How uplooading all files in
> attachments resulting in a big db file will impact on performance ? Is
> couchdb storage designed for such thing ?
>
> - benoƮt


Mime
View raw message