Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77825 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2009 00:59:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2009 00:59:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 14987 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2009 00:59:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14948 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2009 00:59:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14937 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2009 00:59:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:59:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antony.blakey@gmail.com designates 209.85.142.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.142.187] (HELO ti-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.142.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:59:13 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a1so899270tib.3 for ; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:58:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=8jkKEDisZG8UvbKhz7uQ2eFkMV1mP9fwnXKFgoWADJY=; b=TO1vj32SUSP2Jxu6OGQWVNa59IG9P4OAuM1qyqLDIeUVbbg5G7JcoaLm/3unYYYNZX b7cLsuCQKcLRQRlR1zOvai70Dwq7EZ0MhynAfJ41EQai6psNuJvV3QUJV8GTXgl0ZDtW QSRPMVl/EWmQOhYelVBYUYB6rB6zZKv0ZLUkw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=e1HgBDrSnme68YkXScdapdGxouAe4QxHlvSMv5D1/ztbiQ0SKdWMYS9xUr+ZtAIgZF 8T/gsSk5+dHwPWdl+iFikPTevjykrUF8zKAQs89vllybJOkWdxXeMl0oMC+SBA3qrcft 2uOeoBh4g+EUW7ExW7HyJRtzKVoB6pzmyRW9Y= Received: by 10.110.84.3 with SMTP id h3mr8110035tib.20.1236560331565; Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.17? (ppp121-45-108-71.lns10.adl6.internode.on.net [121.45.108.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm7096364tib.8.2009.03.08.17.58.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <239B3CCF-8E7F-4DC1-9B3D-8B8DFDEDF045@gmail.com> From: Antony Blakey To: user@couchdb.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Naming/branding/forking Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:28:45 +1030 References: <66E5803B-0856-4A68-96B8-CF2E853B296A@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 09/03/2009, at 11:14 AM, Chris Anderson wrote: > If one were to use couch_btree and mochiweb to make a JSON store that > is very Couch-like but doesn't pass the CouchDB tests or replicate > with CouchDB nodes, I'd consider it to be a different product, and I > think it would be misleading to call it CouchDB. This accords with our thinking. What would you say if it were purely a matter of the bulk-op semantics? Antony Blakey -------------------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840 787 Hi, I'd like to do $THING. I know that $SOLUTION_A and $SOLUTION_B will do it very easily and for a very reasonable price, but I don't want to use $SOLUTION_A or $SOLUTION_B because $VAGUE_REASON and $CONTRADICTORY_REASON. Instead, I'd like your under-informed ideas on how to achieve my $POORLY_CONCEIVED_AMBITIONS using Linux, duct tape, an iPod, and hours and hours of my precious time. -- Slashdot response to an enquiry