Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39515 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2009 04:43:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2009 04:43:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 93067 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2009 04:43:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 93033 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2009 04:43:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 93022 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2009 04:43:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:43:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jchris@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.13] (HELO mail-gx0-f13.google.com) (209.85.217.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:43:07 +0000 Received: by gxk6 with SMTP id 6so6894625gxk.11 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:42:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WQUNggnwYVVxI6/YdtvUO/Ain1D6HNzuA3fZEGS7yVg=; b=qv1m1E/4d1UnO18Frp8QRTEiaesN4gmOdXzk2Rf4qI8laspqmKgEUNEd0vSXzWC5AA 1k2weJ6InmMrwUPByrKN+Dtv9QipRGhAkl6A6cVWUpFs2Wzjw/wzCYjeLW8Rv8WGRc+D JLKPQ17b1C4pw5Zh+NwkiGRAoP7YweV4IZwco= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=vOZqTNuv6YiGJ6fY05qLXCIVLL55Rzt+LDmJyAxjDnnskPSnXtZ7AN6HpeGcr0U6cb FIwyLFvMgP1IvbgklnebSpiRE493octYA9OgFudqk4fxhmUHmCaCwKW2KDPdNSdtIcUD D6llOws53GY8rSnD/voquWFQBIBXtTKWu6EFo= Received: by 10.64.63.16 with SMTP id l16mr5818824qba.6.1231130566766; Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.73.3 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:42:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:42:46 -0800 From: "Chris Anderson" To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: source performance In-Reply-To: <49618D43.5050908@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <49618D43.5050908@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Lawrence Pit wrote: > Hi, > > A while back I had installed couchdb v0.8. Today I installed from the latest > source (reporting 0.9.0a731428-incubating); I've set debuglevel to error. > However, when I run the test suite the 0.9 version is 4 to 10 times slower > for all tests compared to when I run the test suite using the 0.8 version. There are more tests than in the past, so that should be a factor. There is another thread about document insert rate, which shows the ways people are benchmarking CouchDB. If you were able to post some comparative benchmarks of particular operations, so we could see the difference, I'm sure a lot of us would appreciate it. > > When installing from source, do I need to provide some extra options so that > it performs optimally? > There do seem to be some better versions of Erlang, compile time options etc. Does anyone know where this is best documented? -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com