Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15612 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2009 21:02:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2009 21:02:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 88859 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2009 21:02:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 88829 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2009 21:02:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 88818 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2009 21:02:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:02:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of webjogger@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.227] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:02:04 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so6471512rvb.35 for ; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:01:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=aP0PVCf2tQtLCLssaOxJVRNAHosiFkDM7NmPFrWK2UE=; b=dzlOqwqwDrtYNI7dUZho6gDJXlCkYLF3+HoZjAjFst7GzMzN6VqyypoiRGVKhqZNLS ERv67IdqOLGqhDe0CDUO42BoTdeoeKoMMMw6H9uAnk/JfDGTq4eRj+COBa5BY34gXUog 6VC3kjfcdZY7fPuhbzmKMZfYkZ1NHyOQVfals= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=WpnLeFm6tllS7wGMXHiZzJQ02ThoXWlZcQ1yFlyz/1rMCu42tK1fakJ42p7K4el/TU kyk1rbUoxvXWg/WxG2PyD8tuD5olwuo0hDDZvvlZq7NXEm0LzHHHWTZSxWQ08bWqWtEA td/xmH5qnwSK4/Q6ImF534t3AmspHb+DPb0Ts= Received: by 10.141.162.6 with SMTP id p6mr9523895rvo.136.1231016502878; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:01:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.165.13 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:01:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4c69d7170901031301o5075da81yab97bf6b41d9893a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:01:42 -0800 From: "paul jobs" To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Ten(14) Reasons why Couchdb is better than Mysql In-Reply-To: <30d0cf2c0901031300j3f6b6a26g74b1a6b532b2a59@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_143969_11137688.1231016502868" References: <4c69d7170901031256o26fc6ab2q95b141a97c48b17a@mail.gmail.com> <30d0cf2c0901031300j3f6b6a26g74b1a6b532b2a59@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_143969_11137688.1231016502868 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline nuno you are right but no one has gotten doc as right as couchdb On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Nuno Job wrote: > Relational vs Document. > > Isn't that like comparing a pudding to ice-cream? I mean they are both > deserts. :P > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:56 PM, paul jobs wrote: > > > > > > http://pylab.blogspot.com/2009/01/ten-reasons-why-couchdb-is-better-than.html > > > > Guys I wrote up a small list of reasons why i think couchdb is way > bettter > > than mysql. Do let me know what you think > > > ------=_Part_143969_11137688.1231016502868--