Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29870 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2009 10:42:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2009 10:42:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 11938 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2009 10:42:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 11886 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2009 10:42:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 11875 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2009 10:42:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:42:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.68.94.123] (HELO tumbolia.org) (80.68.94.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:42:01 +0000 Received: from nslater by tumbolia.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LK9NU-0002jj-6e for user@couchdb.apache.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:41:40 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:41:40 +0000 From: Noah Slater To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: renamed _temp_view to _slow_view Message-ID: <20090106104140.GA10472@tumbolia.org> Mail-Followup-To: user@couchdb.apache.org References: <9964500F-9976-4AFF-B47E-DAFED5295A75@pobox.com> <1C2DD95B-7687-49E8-9400-8F0D8F5B7002@apache.org> <97CD791D-266B-47B3-B9E9-776AEA117F08@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <97CD791D-266B-47B3-B9E9-776AEA117F08@gmx.de> X-Noah: Awesome User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:04:14AM +0100, Christopher Lenz wrote: > On 06.01.2009, at 03:36, Chris Anderson wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Christopher Lenz >> wrote: >>> >>> So, um, can we get this change backed out? >>> >> +1 on deleting the feature altogether. It's parallel code in places >> and doesn't provide any functionality. > > -0, personally I'd prefer just changing the name back to _temp_view. Whoops, my previous vote of +1 was based on a misunderstanding. I do not think we should remove the feature altogether, and so: -1 for removing temporary views altogether +1 for backing out the rename changeset > How many such support requests do we get? This is really a matter of > understanding the very basics of CouchDB, so a simple RTFM is entirely > appropriate in such cases IMO. And maybe changing the tone of the > corresponding docs to more strongly and obviously discourage the use of > temp views in production code. Agreed. -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater