From user-return-2593-apmail-couchdb-user-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Sat Jan 03 21:01:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15436 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2009 21:01:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2009 21:01:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 88200 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2009 21:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-user-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 88162 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2009 21:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 88149 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2009 21:01:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:01:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nunojobpinto@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.170.188] (HELO rn-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.170.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:01:09 +0000 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k50so10912935rnd.3 for ; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:00:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=n0zexrb/Vax4uCRmfyStyvEsUPXLkrRdGiPakPwc5Ng=; b=Akfwn5F3iuHHMUBKjL+U/zICrX/xG8ttzMGMUJUSnNLUGXLzEyMKWkmASDyq9BepH6 VMjR6fzZPCIl0cNiEk8UfVHuZX5JkPYn6BmgddmBJnMx+vU4hJj0Pi0Y5+quIsKcFPxg Wl9lHO1Oavv5z9CV2kAVGS/lcq76vvt7nTUZ0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=MoL2piglrbXvxETDIzNvGpC3J+sNMSO5JUfYS6UdbsjtGecnbDpvf6pHqPjPsagrxe ESRaA1AZ9c0AkGogcpPQG5ecrL6VL3/tF/GydKBDRD47pcdij2nw7UPi3k3BKvqxN3Zf KODIv+y68nQLZn1HhEe/k6RuXYy2YXV1uBUJ0= Received: by 10.150.54.6 with SMTP id c6mr10517602yba.196.1231016447882; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:00:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.123.12 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:00:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <30d0cf2c0901031300j3f6b6a26g74b1a6b532b2a59@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:00:47 -0500 From: "Nuno Job" To: user@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Ten(14) Reasons why Couchdb is better than Mysql In-Reply-To: <4c69d7170901031256o26fc6ab2q95b141a97c48b17a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_201205_23351440.1231016447873" References: <4c69d7170901031256o26fc6ab2q95b141a97c48b17a@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_201205_23351440.1231016447873 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Relational vs Document. Isn't that like comparing a pudding to ice-cream? I mean they are both deserts. :P On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:56 PM, paul jobs wrote: > > http://pylab.blogspot.com/2009/01/ten-reasons-why-couchdb-is-better-than.html > > Guys I wrote up a small list of reasons why i think couchdb is way bettter > than mysql. Do let me know what you think > ------=_Part_201205_23351440.1231016447873--