couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Landolt <d...@deanlandolt.com>
Subject Re: Can I guarantee uniqueness in a field without using _id?
Date Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:50:19 GMT
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Antony Blakey <antony.blakey@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On 13/01/2009, at 1:25 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>  We're taking back the word "database"!
>>
>
> Yeah, right - not gonna happen :) More than any other issue - _slow_view
> etc - this induces assumptions that lead to confusion, frustration, endless
> support/help problems.
>
> I vote for Couch Document Store!
>

The word document is just as overloaded as database. I say Couch Data Store
(datastore ~ database without the assumptions).

Or like everything else, document the hell out of it and make heavy use of
the RTFM acronym.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message