couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ara.t.howard" <>
Subject Re: dirty reads - update strategies
Date Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:10:53 GMT

On Nov 13, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Damien Katz wrote:

> My answer is "Don't do that". Values in documents shouldn't depend  
> on values in other documents, that's a better fit for a relational  
> or OO DB. In your example though, CouchDB's views could be used to  
> compute the sums.

i don't think that's realistic.  consider something like the following:

let's say we write a publishing system, users can create documents  
with content and tags.  at the end of the month the editor is going to  
write a summary of the content from that month, obviously this summary  
should be tagged with the union of the tags from all summarized  
content - for later searching.  regardless of whether we store the  
tags inside the document or outside of it we have quite a task - we  
need to get a consistent read of all content for the month, with all  
it's tags, in order to properly construct the summary document with  
it's aggregate tags.  this isn't strict dependence - it's merely a  
read/write consistency issue which nearly any application is going to  
face.  we can argue that it's not important that the summary of tags  
exactly mirrors the tags of it's constituent parts, but that kind of  
thinking results not in an information store, but a collection of  
valueless data.

anyhow, i think it's important to be able to agree upon best practices  
for this kind of operation.  saying that values shouldn't depend on  
values in other documents is quite a statement - it means couch should  
no be used for any information store where the information value needs  
to grow recursively.  in my case we're modeling financial information  
which gets processed in increasingly sophisticated ways - where  
documents are inputs to processes which produce other documents.  i  
can't think of an application that does not do the same thing: a blog  
comment depends on the blog post, a 'friends list' depends on the  
users, etc.

are you referring to 'values' as different from 'ids' ?

kind regards.

a @
we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being  
better. simply reflect on that.
h.h. the 14th dalai lama

View raw message