Mailing-List: contact couchdb-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.198.249 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=h2LWeyCp1Vgw77uoFWYiK9cELzPlyJnCNUykQb0aFaXm+6h8HDRA3LnzhKivpU0ePE
         PHnC/DGx4/zME/uNRn8MxlCFyxFMJ661APssi9nwLv8z3JaMFvgGXQuml9vA9X7BB8Wy
         or6tUeivB5zTHn1RUbUJ0EiGXH4l6gwAxSMuo=
Message-ID: <e2111bbb0809031753n47367d51yb730bb6426b42ab3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:53:04 -0400
From: "Paul Davis" <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>
To: couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Erlang Api for Couchdb
In-Reply-To: <147949.59575.qm@web57212.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <147949.59575.qm@web57212.mail.re3.yahoo.com>

IIRC, those bindings actually communicate via HTTP, but I could be wrong.

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Bradford Winfrey <bradswinfrey@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this helps or not, but I just stumbled across this link while looking for some Varnish/CouchDB information.
> http://github.com/ngerakines/erlang_couchdb/tree/master  maybe some kind of wrapper for erlang to couchdb in a sane format?  I'm no Erl hacker by any means, so if it's useless please disregard!
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Damien Katz <damien@apache.org>
> To: couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2008 11:38:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Erlang Api for Couchdb
>
> The supported Erlang Apis will simply be to document a core set of the
> internal APIs. These documented apis will, generally speaking, always
> be available and behave the same in future releases of CouchDB.
> Anything not in the API will change freely between revisions and
> shouldn't be used.
>
> But things are still in flux, we just last week change the core json
> term format and I'm anticipating some refactoring changes in the view
> code too. When we get closer to 1.0 we'll start documenting and
> locking down the apis. Until then, you can use the stuff in
> couch_httpd to give you an idea what the apis will be.
>
> -Damien
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Michele Sciabarra wrote:
>
>>
>>> Open source, so please scratch your own itch, and all that. But I
>>> will
>>> say that we tend to let Damien have first crack at this sort of thing
>>> (more core concerns).
>> Of course.
>>> I have a strong suspicion he's written CouchDB
>>> all the way up to version 2.0 in his head, and its just a matter
>>> putting it out there.
>>>
>> So if there is already some idea floating around, maybe could be
>> useful to have some suggestion "from the source" and try to work
>> following it.
>>
>>> So go for it if you'd like, but beware that it might only become a
>>> suggestion, when all is said and done. ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> That's  because I am asking about which ideas are around about the
>> possibile Erlang "native" API for CouchDB.
>>
>>
>
>
>