Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-couchdb-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 89371 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2008 15:49:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2008 15:49:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 8712 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2008 15:49:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-couchdb-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8682 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2008 15:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact couchdb-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8671 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2008 15:49:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:49:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.233.184.225] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:48:39 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c53so1655891wra.20 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.90.4 with SMTP id n4mr7446176agb.41.1220888931918; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.117.7 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64a10fff0809080848j13f10716w2437dec5664b7e7a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:48:51 -0400 From: "Dean Landolt" To: couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: view index build time In-Reply-To: <888cd9180809060611i23ab2f74x4c181220c5a0403a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9696_33464116.1220888931913" References: <888cd9180806201345k423a4dc8j64a881f351bd60bd@mail.gmail.com> <888cd9180807021500l154fa147m36af75b8b19009a6@mail.gmail.com> <7679DB26-CAB2-45A7-996B-22BF9865A3A4@ideaforge.org> <888cd9180809060611i23ab2f74x4c181220c5a0403a@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_9696_33464116.1220888931913 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Brad King wrote: > When I talk about CouchDB to other developers here, the first question > I get is if the data can be distributed across multiple nodes or not > (this is usually after the shock of how cool couchdb is wears off a > little). Without this we have many of the same constraints we have > today with relational databases. Yeah JSon storage is super cool, but > in the end capacity and performance will win over ease of use. This > where we see couchdb becoming something serious to consider for > enterprise computing. We just have to be able to drop 3 or 4 million > documents into this thing and not worry at all about index time, > reliability, etc. Just this morning I dropped just a smidgen of couch's coolness on my "cloud computing" professor and he was definitely impressed, but of course this is the first thing he came back to me with. Damn... > I'm sure we'd even pay for commercial licensing if > that were available. Faster Damien! :-) Thank goodness for Apache. I'm pretty confident this isn't in couch's future, but even still, why go down that route? As an open source project, a concrete bounty would likely be a much faster way to spur a feature you're willing to pay for. ------=_Part_9696_33464116.1220888931913--