couchdb-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Any benefit in the pipe from TraceMonkey?
Date Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:31:32 GMT


Cheers
Jan
--


On 27.08.2008, at 04:57, Bradford Winfrey <bradswinfrey@yahoo.com>  
wrote:

> Yea, I figured it wouldn't make an enormous difference since the  
> vast majority of "power" is left to Erl.  Interesting still!  Thanks  
> Chris
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Chris Anderson <jchris@grabb.it>
> To: couchdb-user@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 10:40:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Any benefit in the pipe from TraceMonkey?
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Bradford Winfrey
> <bradswinfrey@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I was just curious about CouchDB's performance (not that I have any  
>> problem with it at the moment). As the buzz surrounding FireFox's  
>> javascript support amplifies with each day they get closer to the  
>> 3.0.1 release, does this mean that there will be some way to slip  
>> TraceMonkey into the mix and reap any benefits?  Just curious - as  
>> I will have a success story to share with the masses using CouchDB  
>> as a backend very, very soon.
>>
>
> In my experience, Javascript view evaluation is not a large part of
> the time spent in view generation. Of course a faster Javascript
> engine will speed things up, but the work that is currently being done
> to make CouchDB take advantage of more cores may have a greater
> effect.
>
> That said, I'm not sure what roadblocks (if any) there are to using  
> TraceMonkey.
>
> Chris
>
> -- 
> Chris Anderson
> http://jchris.mfdz.com
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message