Return-Path: 
 <marketing-return-856-apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9976217A43
	for <apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Sat, 25 Oct 2014 14:24:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 14936 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2014 14:24:32 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14901 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2014 14:24:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:marketing-help@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:marketing-unsubscribe@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:marketing@couchdb.apache.org>
List-Id: <marketing.couchdb.apache.org>
Reply-To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list marketing@couchdb.apache.org
Received: (qmail 14889 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2014 14:24:31 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 14:24:31 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [74.125.82.51] (HELO mail-wg0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 14:24:05 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b13so2848185wgh.10
        for <marketing@couchdb.apache.org>;
 Sat, 25 Oct 2014 07:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to;
        bh=NDzLspSz2+FSrTKRsEGdJtJYJlDrR535z6EN3Mv5Ss4=;
        b=lsMWDD8afrmRN/hoQ7UPAcYbCG4Xt1BaQO+5b5SiVSpedwVpQkuo8V380UPvYYQndT
         b0/8zG38FFOoANrdjcJ29PLXm08dQX76yObHnzU/zHo4eitmT+2VlMzlCqv8jCkZOOGm
         9fjMtCV31IpjOrtRU/szQxego+rM15xdV+g6KyNCIBli4rweAY9BZNh4tmDhnGhS5bEP
         pfXigCzeT/lwh1N7oJwadiXZD4aEpBbly7EdLIEE5YnQh/gy8HlntCVcbT63idtrqMkD
         MnAaqMr12cLqSj6YpYff6lnFxxLmD4HOam9tPCTPaRgD55iSFipSQw/taK1SWQU1N22l
         ziSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQmeGzyqSn1bpK0p9HBzEGiP9j5XqtkuV0E/L/9pZUEZ/qtyrH3tjbYfHAL4hMXX32dMYDbe
X-Received: by 10.195.13.14 with SMTP id eu14mr11405509wjd.31.1414246999350;
        Sat, 25 Oct 2014 07:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [193.171.53.64] ([193.171.53.64])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dr5sm1433974wib.4.2014.10.25.07.23.18
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 25 Oct 2014 07:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
References: 
 <CAPaJBx7vRPARO8F7Ch9ipwWgpEQhJuExHtq+p7isnur_aaG9DA@mail.gmail.com>
 <D020D4D8-827A-49CC-B7D0-DDA4988F79D9@thehoodiefirm.com>
 <CAPaJBx4Z39-EVJ7StpJbc4HBBYBsQFSOZ9JuBWD5zvuYJCSawA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPaJBx4Z39-EVJ7StpJbc4HBBYBsQFSOZ9JuBWD5zvuYJCSawA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary=Apple-Mail-B3195C92-0E90-4701-AEFB-AB3A4376EF7E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6B9BC767-8952-42EC-84CA-5683C4B62DBF@thehoodiefirm.com>
Cc: Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D257)
From: Lena Reinhard <lena@thehoodiefirm.com>
Subject: Re: Moving the weekly news ?
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:23:16 +0200
To: "marketing@couchdb.apache.org" <marketing@couchdb.apache.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--Apple-Mail-B3195C92-0E90-4701-AEFB-AB3A4376EF7E
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sounds good!


> On 25.10.2014, at 15:50, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>=20
> Monday works for me! And sure.
>=20
> (I expect it probably makes sense to just skip one of the Thursday
> ones and move it to Monday when we do switch.)
>=20
>> On 24 October 2014 16:57, Lena Reinhard <lena@thehoodiefirm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Noah,
>>=20
>> that sounds completely reasonable, and we can of course move the Weekly, t=
hat's no big problem for me.
>> Ideal for me would be monday, in terms of user engagement this would also=
 be quite nice, as then the engagement mails would go out on tuesday.
>> I'd suggest we stick to the existing setup and change the day when we lau=
nch AdvocateHub?
>>=20
>> Best,
>> Lena
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On 24 Oct 2014, at 16:54, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Hi Lena,
>>>=20
>>> What would you think about moving the news a different day?
>>>=20
>>> I'm configuring our AdvocateHub, and there's an option to set up a
>>> challenge digest email that goes out to all advocates on a weekly
>>> basis. This email would include the top visible challenges waiting for
>>> the advocate in the hub.
>>>=20
>>> One of the things I'm planning on doing is creating a bunch of
>>> challenge each week that relate to the weekly news (promoting it, or
>>> links contained within it). In fact, quite a big percentage of the
>>> AdvocateHub will be powered by your work!!
>>>=20
>>> The only problem with this as it stands is that if I publish the
>>> challenges on the same day you publish the post, and then the digest
>>> goes out the day after, that means advocates will be getting an email
>>> asking them to promote on a Friday.
>>>=20
>>> Friday is the worst day to do any sort of promotion on social media,
>>> based on data I've seen. Our best days are Tuesday through Wednesday.
>>>=20
>>> So, how about a weekly news that goes out on Mon or Tues? Does that
>>> fit into your existing schedule?
>>>=20
>>> Thanks!
>>>=20
>>> --
>>> Noah Slater
>>> https://twitter.com/nslater
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater

--Apple-Mail-B3195C92-0E90-4701-AEFB-AB3A4376EF7E--