Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A78910723 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:49:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30169 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2014 15:49:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-marketing-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 30115 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2014 15:49:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list marketing@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 30097 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2014 15:49:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:49:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [209.85.219.50] (HELO mail-oa0-f50.google.com) (209.85.219.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:48:54 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id i7so8430828oag.23 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IOnYSz1lL7pXwPZvH7SwIjwTQpNJjhsG8e5jVVcc1uA=; b=JiXrC6CoE0NkdYgx5uk7OQqKyvJubBKqj8HbeuwopGHE2lnD+XdvjqtBs2W58/3I1x NoMZ+ufsqVh8Bh5eKCF3moaFuANZ2hR+EDNrWXvfTjQZ657lHOjGI7wFtp2iBcEa45Cl 592LtNwn/K2m507i+OSzDTkqHEfuFos6E1Za8xNeR+cTsef7qtU3LfFhsvgckpAjMEMK WjlzJtcc8GYAzTvd+fcUo02gBPXm+8Mz4hMaL8WuTWbreW9cFNpq5Is75F/BdtedCddt DJx5MgMaTCV2C+tE7k5p8Dqule8sy89sAs+st4zGUBZ4ueYaLXqwV6IcKTR9+xh6KSbY L90w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmAsl3eFJQgyNWe6nv4PGuCN4McQDpCIuO1YVlbGeotgiurH/uNpXyA8Nj8BCECgLuDbdh MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.44.8 with SMTP id a8mr33521912oem.19.1395244112737; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.130.84 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:48:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [63.155.204.215] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:48:32 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Influitive go-ahead From: "matt j. sorenson" To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2e458b75a4e04f4f7957c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2e458b75a4e04f4f7957c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thank you Noah and kudos again. I like AdvocateHub at a glance also, and will certainly be interested in hearing about your (and the community's) experiences with it. -- Matt On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > The decision making was done on the dev@ list. I selected AdvocateHub > because I liked the look of it. The community agreed to try it out. I > didn't compare it to anything else. > > The only thing done in private was discussing the legal details of how > the hub would be run. The solution was to have me be personally > responsible for it. > > All future decisions about the hub, and how it is used for the > project, will be done on this list. > > On 18 March 2014 23:45, matt j. sorenson wrote: > > Cool. And so, I apologize that I must have missed/dismissed earlier > convos > > regarding this AdvocateHub thingy, as I had no prior knowledge of > > Influitive or their product... > > > > Question: is any of the decision-making "in the open"? As in, I'd be > > interested to understand how you settled on AdvocateHub, what > alternatives > > it may have been compared with, and along which factors? > > > > Curious... because now that I started paying attention :) I might find > some > > other uses for AdvocateHub. > > > > -- > > Matt > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> Some good news. > >> > >> After several months, I have just signed the Influitive agreement as > >> an individual. This comes after some lengthy internal discussion with > >> both the PMC and Apache's VP Brand about the best way to handle this. > >> > >> I am assuming full responsibility for the AdvocateHub, and my > >> agreement with Inlufitive is to operate it in the interests of the > >> CouchDB community. Though, I will be looking to set some of you up as > >> admins so you can help me with this. > >> > >> Also, as previously agreed, I will be doing some promotional work for > >> Influitive, to help them get the message out about the product they > >> are donating. > >> > >> We're not set up yet. This is just to let you know that we're moving > >> forward. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> -- > >> Noah Slater > >> https://twitter.com/nslater > >> > > > > -- > Noah Slater > https://twitter.com/nslater > --001a11c2e458b75a4e04f4f7957c--