From dev-return-48718-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@couchdb.apache.org Tue Aug 6 21:18:28 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A308E180181 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 23:18:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 46349 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2019 21:18:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 46337 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2019 21:18:26 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 21:18:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 83AD9C0EB4 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 21:18:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.801 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.801 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V0xVQNf9o8Ll for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 21:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::834; helo=mail-qt1-x834.google.com; envelope-from=kjsnavely@gmail.com; receiver= Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 412667D3FB for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 21:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id h21so86093863qtn.13 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:18:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fGd6s9dag+QaoFk3Wj9ngqTDLIhbdL8WaolV+9CRJ6k=; b=VrXtcYUOAUl56NDpbwhyrGDuXyNSyza+d+7x3Z1wZtAzepPOas5+PaAyZdjK+Be9FT I3c5JYocUqkLyLhkfbiJHiYtfMYVfBOW647+8pdjcUnKqw4iwsOz8a5VDW6uxXYPHcJO IIczkXAe6eT+tEVgg3XpjGzSR5ryPsmLTbRrUeGbU+IFIyYlFjxHLX4Oye/4vor68Tz7 jRM6DQizhtXR/8Owdv8Vgg6BBFh8QrQI8+Vonq2Lv/yhpcgt5rZEyj8sMwQhg/d4EVfP qFh/JpS7Yop3ezKP81RkDol4E1pGEnqHrUhDge9Wz5o0TXQOJhsXqD2uFtlDMiPi/YzJ MDjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=fGd6s9dag+QaoFk3Wj9ngqTDLIhbdL8WaolV+9CRJ6k=; b=fO48xpFhp0vQEnkQsoWFVQyL6rxk1VfY9jE9C5yy4sHRuDiG2U3GzgixssEG65Fmk/ ykv2mdDBBNPXNo8wBN/abi8OS5nCjiZ/k1a93cZ3I6XFFxF1YBcaxFnF/wdgtNsMbtKy NOcEN7C4XVMOAwpIbdMG0P4mf8WNvs9+8k/xf/J1+LX6oXEk7HoeKduj7yXTqcyaezBq oCBpB9aW6MHh5yuGGdZ5fn6Vi0V7v/VcZTBFLIREItZB6MUjYzCmZO5nwHxtYegFf/W5 R2mZ4f6qPGLJxDn01qBolQel05AFPuT3w8i6+kIZp1J8jhG6gGcFhvIfdTdHpyRfKe+f X7sg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXTflUww0XTjfYN3gEb3+T3IW2OZu1A91H3gCqCposhYb94vq9H 6diHKv/XQ9g2UbQ/h6ud1/syHrQfM2ews34O1M9uE949 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyFdYTJjAsguEjTy8rJXMKV6qFvoj/RQo1RwanxYAgK++6WWS3huEPNKUINBOZEjrRD59T9844YQ8p2x7FzSpE= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3233:: with SMTP id x48mr5188241qta.159.1565126299850; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:18:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <54751AA3-8684-48C2-A7FF-FB3DC160F172@apache.org> <27E9B307-CDB2-4D1D-AA49-34761A2F48D4@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <27E9B307-CDB2-4D1D-AA49-34761A2F48D4@apache.org> From: Kyle Snavely Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 15:18:07 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt FoundationDB To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002199a0058f795dda" --0000000000002199a0058f795dda Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you all! On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 10:41 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote: > The vote passes. Thanks all for participating. > > Onwards! > > Best > Jan, excited > =E2=80=94 > > > On 30. Jul 2019, at 10:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > > Dear CouchDB developers, > > > > This vote decides whether the CouchDB project accepts the proposal[1] > > to switch our underlying storage and distributed systems technology out > > for FoundationDB[2]. > > > > At the outset, we said that we wanted to cover these topic areas before > > making a vote: > > > > - Bylaw changes > > - RFC process: done, passed > > - Add qualified vote option: done, changes proposed were not > > ratified > > > > - Roadmap: proposal done, detailed discussions TBD, includes > > deprecations > > > > - Onboarding: ASF onboarding links shared, CouchDB specific onboarding > > TBD. > > > > - (Re-)Branding: tentatively: 3.0 is the last release before FDB > > CouchDB and 4.0 is the FDB CouchDB. If we need nicknames, we can > > decide on those later. > > > > - FoundationDB Governance: FoundationDB is currently loosely organised > > between Apple and a few key stakeholder companies invested in the > > technology. Apple contributions are trending downwards relatively, > > approaching 50%, which means in the future, more non-Apple than Apple > > contributions are likely. > > > > In addition, the CouchDB PMC has requested addition to the current > > organisational FDB weekly meeting, which is where any more formal > > governance decisions are going to be made and the CouchDB PMC can be > > a part of the surrounding discussions. > > > > - FoundationDB Operations knowledge: IBM has intends to share this > > knowledge as they acquire it in conjunction with Apache CouchDB in > > terms of general ops knowledge, best practices and tooling. > > > > - Proj. Mgmt.: RFC process + outline list of TBD RFCs allow for enough > > visibility and collaboration opportunities, everyone on dev@ list is > > encouraged to participate. > > > > - Tech deep dives: DISCUSS threads and RFCs are covering this, current > > list of TBD DISCUSS/RFCs, for the proposal. Most of which were > > already discussed on dev@ or RFC=E2=80=99d in our documentation repo: > > > > * JSON doc storage and storage of edit conflicts > > * revision management > > * _changes feed > > * _db_updates > > * _all_docs > > * database creation and deletion > > * attachments > > * mango indexes (including collation) > > * map-only views / search / geo > > * reduces > > * aggregate metrics (data_size, etc.) > > * release engineering > > * local/desktop/dev install security > > > > * * * > > > > As shown above, all topics we wanted to have clarity on have been > > advanced to a point where we are now ready to make a decision: > > > > Should Apache CouchDB adopt FoundationDB? > > > > Since this is a big decision, I suggest we make this a Lazy 2/3 > > Majority Vote with PMC Binding Votes, and a 7 day duration (as per our > > bylaws[3]). > > > > You can cast your votes now. > > > > Best > > Jan > > =E2=80=94 > > [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/04e7889354c077a6beb91fd1292b6d38b7a3= f2c6a5dc7d20f5b87c44@%3Cdev.couchdb.apache.org%3E > > [2]: https://www.foundationdb.org > > [3]: https://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html > > > > > > -- > Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: > https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ > > --0000000000002199a0058f795dda--